[2025] KEHC 2587 (KLR)
The court held that administration cannot be imposed on a person who declines the appointment, and therefore Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno's appointment as co-administratrix must be revoked. The court further determined that it could not make any determinations on the proposed redistribution of assets until it is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 2587 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno; Respondent: Fredrick Mukasa Okhongo; Respondent: Charles Omondi Lwanga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 175 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Grant and Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- Partial grant of application; appointment of co-administratrix revoked; amendment of grant ordered; decision on redistribution deferred.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant Amendment, Administration of Estates
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno
Applicant
Fredrick Mukasa Okhongo
Respondent
Charles Omondi Lwanga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Grant and Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant and certificate of confirmation of grant should be amended following the refusal of an appointed administratrix to serve.
- 2 Whether the court can alter the distribution of assets without hearing from all beneficiaries, specifically Charles Omondi Lwanga.
- 3 Whether administration can be imposed on a person who declines appointment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that administration cannot be imposed on a person who declines the appointment, and therefore Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno's appointment as co-administratrix must be revoked. The court further determined that it could not make any determinations on the proposed redistribution of assets until it is satisfied that all beneficiaries, particularly Charles Omondi Lwanga, have been served and given an opportunity to be heard. The court allowed the revocation of Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno's appointment and ordered amendment of the grant accordingly, but deferred any decision on the redistribution of assets pending compliance with service requirements.
Court Disposition
Partial grant of application; appointment of co-administratrix revoked; amendment of grant ordered; decision on redistribution deferred.
Orders
- Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno's appointment as co-administratrix is revoked.
- The grant shall be amended to remove Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno as co-administratrix.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
In re Estate of Agnes Masbay Ongoma Otieno (Deceased) (Succession Cause 175 of 2014) [2025] KEHC 2587 (KLR) (14 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2587 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Succession Cause 175 of 2014
WM Musyoka, J
March 14, 2025
Ruling
1. On 1st December 2023, I delivered a ruling herein, where I confirmed the grant and appointed an additional administratrix.
2. The parties have come back to court, with an application for amendment of the grant and certificate of confirmation of grant. The administratrix, that I appointed by my ruling of 1st December 2023, has turned down that appointment, for reasons that she has given. The other argument is that some of the assets cannot be distributed as per the confirmation orders, for a variety of reasons, given in the application.
3. Attached, to that application, is a consent, duly signed by 13 of the beneficiaries. 2 did not sign, being Fredrick Mukasa Okhongo and Charles Omondi Lwanga. Fredrick Mukasa Okhongo has filed grounds of opposition, objecting that the application is not properly founded.
4. Most of the beneficiaries agree, going by the consent that I have mentioned above. The 2 who did not sign are in the minority. Usually the majority have their way, and the minority their say, but the application must be determined judiciously, nevertheless. 1 in the minority has had his say, through his grounds of opposition. The other has not filed any papers, and I have nothing on record to establish that he had been served with the application, for I have not come across an affidavit of service of the application on him. He has a right to be heard before any orders are made to alter the distribution earlier ordered by the court.
5. I shall refrain from making any determinations on the proposed distribution, until I get to hear from Charles Omondi Lwanga, through a filing by him, or evidence, from the administrators, that they served the application on him. Parties have 14 days to comply. I shall mention the matter on 8th April 2025.
6. It is Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno who has declined appointment as co-administratrix. Administration cannot be imposed. Consequently, I shall allow that component of the application. I hereby revoke her appointment as such, and the grant on record, if it has been issued, shall be amended to reflect that, and if it has not, then a grant shall be issued without her name.It is so ordered.
DELIVERED VIA EMAIL, DATED AND SIGNED IN CHAMBERS AT BUSIA ON THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. W MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant.AdvocatesMr. Gabriel Fwaya, Advocate for the applicant.Mr. Opiyo, instructed by Aming’a Opiyo Masese & Company, Advocates for the 1st protestor.Mr. Masafu, instructed by Wekesa & Simiyu, Advocates for the 2nd protestor.