[2018] KEHC 6814 (KLR)
Although the application sought to redistribute the estate rather than merely correct errors as contemplated under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act, the court found that, in the absence of any heirs to the deceased beneficiary and with the consent of all other beneficiaries, no prejudice would be suffered by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 6814 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nasra Issa Ali; Respondent: Hassan Ali Ossoble (deceased)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 384 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Testate Succession, Rectification of Grant, Probate, Estate Distribution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nasra Issa Ali
Applicant
Hassan Ali Ossoble (deceased)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can allow rectification of a confirmed grant to redistribute a deceased beneficiary's share where the beneficiary died intestate and without heirs.
- 2 Whether the applicant/executrix can inherit absolutely the share of land initially bequeathed to the deceased beneficiary.
Ratio Decidendi
Although the application sought to redistribute the estate rather than merely correct errors as contemplated under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act, the court found that, in the absence of any heirs to the deceased beneficiary and with the consent of all other beneficiaries, no prejudice would be suffered by granting the application. The court invoked Article 159 of the Constitution to dispense justice without undue technicalities, allowing the executrix to inherit the entire parcel of land, including the share initially bequeathed to the deceased beneficiary who died intestate and without heirs.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 26th February, 2013 is amended to vest L.R. No. Block/634 Kakamega absolutely in the applicant/executrix as sole proprietor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 384 OF 2013
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF AMINA ROBLE WARFA (DECEASED)
RULING
1. The deceased herein died testate on 26th February 2010 leaving behind a written Will dated 29th December 2008 wherein she appointed her granddaughter Nasra Issa Ali as the executrix and bequeathed to her 44 feet by 44feet and her son Hassan Ali Ossoble 44 feet by 76 feet of land out of LR No. Kakamega/Block 1/634.
2. Upon her demise, the said executrix petitioned for a grant of probate with written Will on 1/3/2011 and subsequently had the same issued on 20th September, 2015 and then confirmed on 26th February 2013.
3. However, before completion of the administration of the estate, Hassan Ali Ossoble (beneficiary) died leaving no heir to inherit his share. Consequently, the executrix moved the court vide summons for rectification of the grant of probate dated 10th January 2018 seeking to amend the certificate of confirmation of grant of probate with written Will so as to allow her assume ownership of the portion of land bequeathed to the deceased uncle Hassan Ali Ossoble who died without leaving a wife nor children.
4. Application was supported by affidavit sworn by the applicant in person and other beneficiaries who signified their consent to the extent that they had no objection in the executrix taking the entire parcel of land inclusive of Hassan Ali Ossoble’s share.
5. Rectification of a grant or confirmed grant under Section 74 entails correction of errors in names and descriptions, or in setting out the time and place of the deceased’s death, or the purpose in a limited grant. The application herein is not seeking any of those elements. It is ideally seeking to redistribute the estate which should be done under review after securing a separate grant on succession cause in respect of the deceased beneficiary to serve as proof of the rightful heirs of his estate. However, Article 159 of the Constitution binds us and gives guidelines that justice shall be dispensed with without regard to undue technicalities.
6. Since the beneficiary is deceased living no heir and the only heirs in order of priority of the deceased beneficiary’s estate who would have been the executrix herself and her siblings who have no objection to this application, there will be no prejudice suffered if I allowed the same.
7. Accordingly, application dated 10th January, 2018 is allowed with orders that the certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 26th February, 2013 in respect of the estate herein be amended and L.R. No. Block/634 Kakamega be inherited by the applicant/executrix absolutely as the sole proprietor.
Order accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY, 2018.
J.N. ONYIEGO (JUDGE)
In the presence of:
No appearance for Counsel for the applicant
Edwin Court Assistant