[2019] KEHC 7860 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 7860 (KLR)

The court found that the deceased was polygamous but all widows were deceased, leaving only children as beneficiaries. Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act mandates equal distribution among surviving children where there is no surviving spouse. The court rejected the petitioner's proposed mode of distribution for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 7860 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Joseph Gatongo Henry; Respondent: Emily Kirito Anampiu; Respondent: Teresia Mwonjiru Anampiu; Respondent: Tiofana Mwathe Anampiu; Respondent: Paul Munathia Anampiu; Respondent: Joseph Kaloo Anampiu; Respondent: Doreen Gakii Anampiu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 3 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
grant confirmed; estate distributed equally among beneficiaries; each party to bear own costs
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Polygamous Estate, Gift Inter Vivos
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Polygamous Estate Gift Inter Vivos

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Gatongo Henry

Petitioner

Emily Kirito Anampiu

Respondent

Teresia Mwonjiru Anampiu

Respondent

Tiofana Mwathe Anampiu

Respondent

Paul Munathia Anampiu

Respondent

Joseph Kaloo Anampiu

Respondent

Doreen Gakii Anampiu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the estate of the deceased should be distributed equally among the surviving children in accordance with the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the sale of 1 ½ acres of Akiaga Farm No. 4006 was lawful and with proper consent.
  3. 3 Whether the gift inter vivos to Paul Mungathia Anampiu should be taken into account in the distribution of the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the deceased was polygamous but all widows were deceased, leaving only children as beneficiaries. Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act mandates equal distribution among surviving children where there is no surviving spouse. The court rejected the petitioner's proposed mode of distribution for lack of evidence and for being contrary to the law, particularly as it sought to give daughters lesser shares and to validate an unlawful sale. The court recognized a gift inter vivos to Paul Mungathia Anampiu (Plot No. 7), which must be accounted for under Section 42. The court ordered equal distribution of the estate among all surviving children and the estates of deceased...

Court Disposition

grant confirmed; estate distributed equally among beneficiaries; each party to bear own costs

Orders

  • The grant is confirmed.
  • Estate properties to be distributed equally among all surviving children and estates of deceased children, except for Plot No. 7 which is to Paul Mungathia Anampiu as a gift inter vivos.