[2022] KEHC 16876 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16876 (KLR)

The court found that the objectors failed to provide any evidence that the deceased held parcel Irong/Korkitony/64 in trust for them or any other family members. The only evidence produced was a green card showing the land registered in the deceased's name. The objectors, though related to the deceased, did not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16876 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Clara Jepchirchir Lagat; Applicant: Mark Kipngetich Biy; Respondent: Flora Jeserem Murisha; Respondent: Elizabeth Jemaiyo Kiptanui; Respondent: Catherine Cherono Chemweno
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 287 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Distribution of Estate After Objection Proceedings
Outcome
Objection dismissed; estate distributed as per court's determination.
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Succession, Distribution of Estate, Trusts in Land, Beneficial Interest, Dependant Status
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession Distribution of Estate Trusts in Land Beneficial Interest Dependant Status

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clara Jepchirchir Lagat

Applicant

Mark Kipngetich Biy

Applicant

Flora Jeserem Murisha

Respondent

Elizabeth Jemaiyo Kiptanui

Respondent

Catherine Cherono Chemweno

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Distribution of Estate After Objection Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the objectors have a beneficial interest in parcel Irong/Korkitony/64 by virtue of trust.
  2. 2 Whether the objectors qualify as dependants or beneficiaries of the deceased under the Law of Succession Act.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate mode of distribution of the estate of Andrew Kibii Lagat.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the objectors failed to provide any evidence that the deceased held parcel Irong/Korkitony/64 in trust for them or any other family members. The only evidence produced was a green card showing the land registered in the deceased's name. The objectors, though related to the deceased, did not prove they were dependants as defined under Section 29 of the Law of Succession Act, nor did they establish any beneficial interest in the disputed land. The court therefore rejected the objectors' claim and adopted the petitioner's proposed mode of distribution, with minor adjustments, distributing the estate primarily among the widow, children, and other close relatives of the...

Court Disposition

Objection dismissed; estate distributed as per court's determination.

Orders

  • Estate of Andrew Kibii Lagat to be distributed as specified in paragraph 18 of the ruling.
  • Church to receive 2 acres of Irong/Korkitony/64.