[2025] KEHC 3324 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 3324 (KLR)

The court found that since the parties had entered into a consent dated 6th December 2024, which was already on record, the issues raised in the application dated 28th June 2024 had been resolved amicably. There was no longer any live dispute requiring judicial determination. Accordingly, the court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 3324 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Susan Muthoni Kamande; Applicant: Naomi Wanjiku Kamande; Respondent: Kinyanjui Kirimi Advocates
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 898 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Directions
Outcome
Matter marked as closed by consent of the parties.
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Estate Administration, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Proceedings Estate Administration Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Muthoni Kamande

Applicant

Naomi Wanjiku Kamande

Applicant

Kinyanjui Kirimi Advocates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Directions

  1. 1 Whether the application dated 28th June 2024 requires determination following the parties' consent.
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be marked as closed based on the compromise reached by the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the parties had entered into a consent dated 6th December 2024, which was already on record, the issues raised in the application dated 28th June 2024 had been resolved amicably. There was no longer any live dispute requiring judicial determination. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to mark the matter as closed, as the consent effectively compromised the proceedings. The court emphasized that it would not address the merits of the application in light of the parties' agreement.

Court Disposition

Matter marked as closed by consent of the parties.

Orders

  • The matter is hereby marked closed unless otherwise moved.