[2023] KEHC 27134 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 27134 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was not served with a notice to show cause prior to the revocation of the grant, which is a fundamental breach of the right to be heard. The absence of service rendered the revocation procedurally improper, regardless of the applicant's prolonged delay in prosecuting the matter....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 27134 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Janes Kemunto Abere
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 131 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Revocation of Grant and Reinstate Grant
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
TA Odera
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Revocation of Grant, Reinstatement of Grant, Notice to Show Cause
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Proceedings Revocation of Grant Reinstatement of Grant Notice to Show Cause

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Janes Kemunto Abere

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Revocation of Grant and Reinstate Grant

  1. 1 Whether the revocation of the grant of letters of administration intestate was proper in the absence of service of notice to show cause upon the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the grant should be reinstated and the applicant allowed to apply for confirmation despite the long delay.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's ill health and financial hardship constitute sufficient reason for the delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was not served with a notice to show cause prior to the revocation of the grant, which is a fundamental breach of the right to be heard. The absence of service rendered the revocation procedurally improper, regardless of the applicant's prolonged delay in prosecuting the matter. The court recognized the applicant's ill health and financial hardship as contributing factors to the delay but emphasized that the lack of notice was determinative. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to review and set aside the revocation order, reinstating the grant and granting the applicant a final opportunity to apply for confirmation within a specified period,...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The orders of 9th July 2015 revoking the grant are set aside.
  • The Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate issued on 26th May 1995 is reinstated.