[2021] KEHC 5403 (KLR)
The court found that a DNA test between the applicant (the deceased's brother) and Johnson Gioche Mwangi may provide useful evidence regarding the latter's relationship to the deceased, which is central to the succession dispute. While acknowledging that such a test is not conclusive of paternity, the court held...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 5403 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Esther Muthoni Mwangi; Applicant: John R. Gathaiya Macharia
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 736 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application for DNA Testing Prior to Determination of Main Petition
- Outcome
- Application for DNA test allowed with specific directions.
- Judges
- K Kimondo
- Legal Topics
- Paternity Dispute, Dna Testing, Succession Rights, Proof of Relationship
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Muthoni Mwangi
Respondent
John R. Gathaiya Macharia
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application for DNA Testing Prior to Determination of Main Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order a DNA test between the applicant and Johnson Gioche Mwangi to determine the latter's relationship to the deceased.
- 2 Whether such a test is probative and necessary for the resolution of the succession dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that a DNA test between the applicant (the deceased's brother) and Johnson Gioche Mwangi may provide useful evidence regarding the latter's relationship to the deceased, which is central to the succession dispute. While acknowledging that such a test is not conclusive of paternity, the court held that it is a reasonable and practical step given the circumstances, especially considering the deceased has been dead for over twenty years and exhumation would be costly and complex. The court thus exercised its discretion to order the DNA test between the applicant and Johnson Gioche Mwangi, to be conducted by an accredited institution, with costs to be borne by the applicant.
Court Disposition
Application for DNA test allowed with specific directions.
Orders
- A DNA test shall be carried out between John R. Gathaiya alias John Gathaiya Gioche and Johnson Gioche Mwangi to determine any relationship between the latter and the deceased, Arthur Mwangi Gioche.
- The test shall be conducted by either the Government Chemist or the Kenya Medical Research Institute. An original copy of the report shall be filed in court as soon as practicable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 736 OF 2013
[FORMERLY NAIROBI HIGH COURT P&A CAUSE 1713 OF 2008 & NYERI HIGH COURT P&A CAUSE 172 OF 2011]
RE ESTATE OF ARTHUR IKUA GIOCHE (DECEASED)
ESTHER MUTHONI MWANGI...............................................PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
VERSUS
JOHN R. GATHAIYA MACHARIA.........................................DEFENDANT/APPLICANT
RULING
1. The applicant craves an order that a Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) test be carried out between him and one Johnson Gioche Mwangi to determine if the latter is a son of Arthur Mwangi Gioche (hereafter the deceased).
2. The background is that the respondent claims to have been married to the deceased and sired a son, Johnson Gioche, who is now an adult. The retort by the applicant is three-fold: First, that at the material time, the health of the deceased had so much deteriorated that he was incapable of getting children. Secondly, that the respondent had merely been hired as a helper; and, thirdly, that there was no evidence of any marriage between her and the deceased.
3. The main petition is still pending. I will thus refrain completely from commenting on those matters at this stage.
4. The only live issue arising from the applicant’s notice of motion dated 11th March 2019 is whether he deserves an order for the DNA examination. He avers that he is a blood brother of the deceased. That makes him an uncle to Johnson Gioche. He asserts that the examination “will conclusively prove the paternity” of the latter.
5. The application is opposed by the plaintiff and her son vide two affidavits sworn on 7th February 2020 and 13th November 2020 respectively. The plaintiff contends that the motion is a fishing expedition only meant to delay justice. Her son, Johnson Gioche, avers that he is prepared to take the test but only between him and the deceased.
6. There is no doubt that the Court is imbued with power to order a DNA test where a proper foundation is laid. See generally In re Estate of PWM (Deceased) High Court, Machakos, Cause No. 974 of 2013 [2016] eKLR.
7. In the instant case, the DNA test may help to unravel the relationship between the deceased and Johnson Gioche Mwangi which is material to the succession dispute. However, the applicant is an uncle to the deceased. Although he asserts that they were born of the same mother and father, the DNA test may be useful evidence but not necessarily conclusive of the paternity issue. Learned counsel for the applicant, Mr Gitonga, conceded as much.
8. On the other hand, I find that it is self-serving for Johnson Gioche to insist on a test between him and the deceased. It is not lost on me that the deceased died over twenty years ago; to be exact, on 12th January 2001. I take judicial notice of the costs and procedures attendant to exhumation of his remains.
9. In the interests of justice, I will thus order as follows-
(a) That a Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) test be carried out between John R. Gathaiya alias John Gathaiya Gioche and Johnson Gioche Mwangi to determine any relationship between the latter and the deceased, Arthur Mwangi Gioche.
(b) That the test shall be carried out by either the Government Chemist or the Kenya Medical Research Institute. An original copy of the report shall be filed in court as soon as practicable.
(c) That all the costs of carrying out the test shall be borne wholly by the defendant/applicant.
(d) I make no further order on costs.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MURANG’Athis 6th day of July 2021.
KANYI KIMONDO
JUDGE
Ruling read in open court in the presence of:
Mr. Mikwa holding brief for Mr. Gitonga for the defendant/applicant instructed by M. M. Gitonga & Company Advocates.
Mr. Mwaniki for the plaintiff/respondent instructed by Mwaniki Warima & Company Advocates.
Johnson Gioche Mwangi (in person) present.
Ms. Dorcas Waichuhi & Ms. Susan Waiganjo, Court Assistants.