[2017] KEHC 8018 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 8018 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had indeed died and that another person had obtained letters of administration ad litem for the purpose of representing the deceased's estate. The court held that, for whatever value it may have, the substitution should be allowed, as the requirements for substitution had been met....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 8018 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ashford Njuguna Nduni (Deceased); Respondent: Unknown Objector(s)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1589 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Deceased Applicant
Outcome
application for substitution allowed
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Substitution of Parties, Letters of Administration, Estate Management
Source Language
en
Family and Children Substitution of Parties Letters of Administration Estate Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ashford Njuguna Nduni (Deceased)

Applicant

Unknown Objector(s)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Deceased Applicant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant, having died, can be substituted by a person with letters of administration ad litem.
  2. 2 Whether the application for substitution is spent or overtaken by events.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had indeed died and that another person had obtained letters of administration ad litem for the purpose of representing the deceased's estate. The court held that, for whatever value it may have, the substitution should be allowed, as the requirements for substitution had been met. The opposition, which argued that the application was spent or overtaken by events, did not provide sufficient grounds to deny the substitution. Therefore, the application for substitution was allowed and costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

application for substitution allowed

Orders

  • The application for substitution is allowed.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.