[2025] KEHC 9813 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 9813 (KLR)

The court found that Julius Masiva Obuga was neither admitted as an advocate nor possessed a valid practicing certificate as required by the Advocates Act. His purported representation of the Objector did not fall within the exceptions provided under Article 22(2) of the Constitution, as there was no infringement of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 9813 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Burton Asonga Shavanga; Respondent: Benjamin Shahasi Asoga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Vihiga
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 66 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Representation and Procedural Applications
Outcome
Notice of Appointment and Ex parte Chamber Summons struck out and expunged; further directions issued regarding representation and mediation.
Judges
JN Kamau
Legal Topics
Representation in Court, Powers of Attorney, Unauthorised Legal Practice, Probate and Administration
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Representation in Court Powers of Attorney Unauthorised Legal Practice Probate and Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Burton Asonga Shavanga

Applicant

Benjamin Shahasi Asoga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Representation and Procedural Applications

  1. 1 Whether Julius Masiva Obuga is qualified to represent the Objector in court proceedings as an advocate or under Article 22 of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether pleadings filed by an unqualified person should be expunged from the court record.
  3. 3 Whether there was any infringement of the Bill of Rights justifying representation under Article 22 of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Julius Masiva Obuga was neither admitted as an advocate nor possessed a valid practicing certificate as required by the Advocates Act. His purported representation of the Objector did not fall within the exceptions provided under Article 22(2) of the Constitution, as there was no infringement of the Bill of Rights or other qualifying circumstance. Consequently, all pleadings filed by him were deemed irregular and improper, warranting their expungement from the court record. The court further noted the increasing trend of unqualified persons and inactive advocates appearing before courts, emphasizing the need to uphold the integrity of legal representation.

Court Disposition

Notice of Appointment and Ex parte Chamber Summons struck out and expunged; further directions issued regarding representation and mediation.

Orders

  • The Notice of Appointment dated 5th May 2025 and filed on 10th June 2025 and the Ex parte Chamber Summons application dated 3rd June 2025 and filed on 10th June 2025 are struck out and expunged from the court records.
  • Julius Masiva Obuga is placed in the cells at Vihiga Law Courts to enable communication with the Law Society of Kenya; further orders to be given.