[2020] KEHC 4027 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 4027 (KLR)

The court found that the confirmation of the grant was obtained by fraudulent means, specifically by the petitioner presenting a consent for confirmation purportedly signed by the objector, whose signature did not match her known signature. This discrepancy indicated that the objector did not consent to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 4027 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: James Egessa Luande; Objector: Margaret Mukasa Wafula
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration 336 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Application for revocation of grant allowed; confirmed grant annulled; co-administrators appointed.
Judges
KW Kiarie
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Fraudulent Obtainment of Grant, Intestate Succession, Priority of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Fraudulent Obtainment of Grant Intestate Succession Priority of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Egessa Luande

Petitioner

Margaret Mukasa Wafula

Objector

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of representation was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts or by means of an untrue allegation essential in law.
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings to obtain the grant were defective in substance.
  3. 3 Whether the objector's signature on the consent for confirmation was forged or not genuine.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the confirmation of the grant was obtained by fraudulent means, specifically by the petitioner presenting a consent for confirmation purportedly signed by the objector, whose signature did not match her known signature. This discrepancy indicated that the objector did not consent to the confirmation, and possibly the same applied to other heirs. The court held that such conduct amounted to fraud and concealment of material facts, warranting revocation of the grant under section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. The court annulled the confirmed grant, ordered the title to revert to the deceased, and appointed both the petitioner and objector as co-administrators,...

Court Disposition

Application for revocation of grant allowed; confirmed grant annulled; co-administrators appointed.

Orders

  • The confirmed grant dated 15th February is annulled.
  • Title in respect of L.R No. Samia/Luchululo-Bukhulungu/156 to revert to the deceased.