[2019] KEHC 1006 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 1006 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had provided sufficient grounds for the delay in seeking substitution of the deceased parties and for revival of the suit. As the application was unopposed and the reasons for delay were explained, the court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought, allowing...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 1006 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Margaret Wangechi; Applicant: Benson Mwangi Kariuki; Applicant: Joram Benard Kariuki; Applicant: Jane Wambui Kung'u; Applicant: Nahashon Chege Kariuki; Applicant: Robert Kimemia Kariuki; Applicant: Estate of Eva Njeri; Applicant: Geoffrey Kamau Kariuki; Respondent: Benson Mugo Kariuki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1234 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Substitution and Revival of Suit
Outcome
Application for substitution and revival granted.
Judges
A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Substitution of Parties, Abatement of Suit, Revival of Succession Cause
Source Language
en
Family and Children Substitution of Parties Abatement of Suit Revival of Succession Cause

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Wangechi

Applicant

Benson Mwangi Kariuki

Applicant

Joram Benard Kariuki

Applicant

Jane Wambui Kung'u

Applicant

Nahashon Chege Kariuki

Applicant

Robert Kimemia Kariuki

Applicant

Estate of Eva Njeri

Applicant

Geoffrey Kamau Kariuki

Applicant

Benson Mugo Kariuki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Substitution and Revival of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the court should allow substitution of deceased applicants in a succession cause.
  2. 2 Whether the suit against the deceased applicants should be revived after abatement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had provided sufficient grounds for the delay in seeking substitution of the deceased parties and for revival of the suit. As the application was unopposed and the reasons for delay were explained, the court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought, allowing substitution of the deceased applicants and revival of the suit against them.

Court Disposition

Application for substitution and revival granted.

Orders

  • Prayers 1-4 of the application dated 10th September, 2019 are granted.