[2018] KEHC 1196 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 1196 (KLR)

The court found that Alice Sebi Minayo was not a widow of the deceased, as previously determined by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, but was recognized as a dependant. As such, she was not entitled to an equal share of the estate with the widow and children but was entitled to reasonable provision. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 1196 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Grace Ayugu; Respondent: Alice Sebi Minayo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 133 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
application allowed with modifications
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Dependant Entitlement, Distribution of Estate, Pension and Gratuity, Status of Widow
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Confirmation of Grant Dependant Entitlement Distribution of Estate Pension and Gratuity Status of Widow

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Grace Ayugu

Applicant

Alice Sebi Minayo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether Alice Sebi Minayo is entitled to a share of the deceased's estate as a widow or only as a dependant.
  2. 2 How the estate of Bernard Karani Ayugu should be distributed among the survivors and dependants.
  3. 3 Whether the pension and death gratuity should be shared with the dependant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Alice Sebi Minayo was not a widow of the deceased, as previously determined by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, but was recognized as a dependant. As such, she was not entitled to an equal share of the estate with the widow and children but was entitled to reasonable provision. The court determined that awarding her the asset where she had lived with the deceased (Nzoia/Moi’s Bridge/Block 1/1727) constituted adequate provision. The pension and death gratuity, by law, were to be distributed only to the widow and children. The rest of the estate was to be distributed as per the applicant's proposal, with the certificate of confirmation of grant to issue...

Court Disposition

application allowed with modifications

Orders

  • Nzoia/Moi’s Bridge/Block 1/1727 to Alice Sebi Minayo.
  • Nzoia/Moi’s Bridge/Block 1/652 to Mary Grace Ayugu.