[2022] KEHC 10011 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 10011 (KLR)

The court found that the application, though brought in person and challenged on technical grounds, raised a clear and substantive complaint regarding the refusal of certain administrators and beneficiaries to sign forms necessary for the transfer of shares to beneficiaries. The court held that technical objections...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 10011 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Frank David Gitura Kariithi; Respondent: Peter Ngure Kariithi; Respondent: Hosea Nderi Kariithi; Respondent: Johnson Gachoki Kariithi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 383 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Facilitation of Share Transfer and Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Application allowed with directions; preliminary objection dismissed.
Judges
AO Muchelule
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Distribution of Shares, Duties of Administrators, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Administration of Estates Distribution of Shares Duties of Administrators Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frank David Gitura Kariithi

Applicant

Peter Ngure Kariithi

Respondent

Hosea Nderi Kariithi

Respondent

Johnson Gachoki Kariithi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Facilitation of Share Transfer and Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the administrators and beneficiaries are obligated to sign individual CDS account forms to facilitate transfer of shares to beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether technical objections can defeat a substantive application regarding estate administration under Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution.
  3. 3 Whether the administrators have complied with their statutory duty to complete administration and account to the court under section 83(g) of the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application, though brought in person and challenged on technical grounds, raised a clear and substantive complaint regarding the refusal of certain administrators and beneficiaries to sign forms necessary for the transfer of shares to beneficiaries. The court held that technical objections could not override the need to do substantive justice, as mandated by Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution. Furthermore, the administrators had not completed the administration of the estate nor provided the required accounts to the court as per section 83(g) of the Law of Succession Act. The court directed the administrators to file a full and accurate account of the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed with directions; preliminary objection dismissed.

Orders

  • Administrators to file a full and accurate account of the completed administration of the estate within 60 days.
  • Deputy Registrar to sign individual CDS account forms if not signed by administrators or beneficiaries within 7 days.