[2017] KEHC 848 (KLR)
The court found that the deceased was survived by a widow and a minor child, and that the applicant, as the deceased's father, had not demonstrated any legal entitlement to a share of the estate. Under the Law of Succession Act, where a deceased is survived by a spouse and child, the estate devolves to them to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 848 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: P N K; Respondent: L W M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1193 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Grant confirmed in favour of the widow; estate to be distributed to her absolutely.
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Rights of Surviving Spouse, Rights of Children
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P N K
Applicant
L W M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased's father is entitled to a share of the estate where the deceased is survived by a spouse and child.
- 2 How the net estate of the deceased should be distributed under intestate succession laws.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the deceased was survived by a widow and a minor child, and that the applicant, as the deceased's father, had not demonstrated any legal entitlement to a share of the estate. Under the Law of Succession Act, where a deceased is survived by a spouse and child, the estate devolves to them to the exclusion of the deceased's parents. The court therefore confirmed the grant in favour of the widow, directing that the net estate be distributed to her absolutely so she can care for herself and her child.
Court Disposition
Grant confirmed in favour of the widow; estate to be distributed to her absolutely.
Orders
- The net estate of the deceased shall go absolutely to the 2nd Administrator, L W M, for the benefit of herself and her child, F A W K.
- Parties shall bear their own costs of the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO 1193 OF 2013
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF BKN - DECEASED
1. P N K...............1ST ADMIN/APPLICANT
VERSUS
2. L W M............2ND ADMIN/PROTESTOR
J U D G M E N T
1. A grant of letters of administration intestate was made herein on 09/10/2014 jointly to P N K and L W M (respectively the 1st and 2nd Administrator). They are respectively the father and widow of the Deceased B K N.
2. The 1st Administrator subsequently applied by summons dated 24/04/2015for confirmation of that grant. At paragraph 6 of his supporting affidavit he proposed that the funds in a savings account held by the Deceased and a gratuity due upon his death be shared equally between the two Administrators.
3. The 2nd Administrator filed an affidavit of protest on 30/06/2015. She was totally opposed to the 1st Administrator sharing in the Deceased’s estate. She pointed out that the Deceased was survived by his widow (2nd Administrator) and a seven-year old daughter, F A W K(W), and that the two are the rightful heirs of the Deceased. In a supplementary affidavit of protest filed on 17/06/2016 the 2nd Administrator exhibited the birth certificate of W. She was born on 18/11/2008. The Deceased died on 15/08/2013.
4. This judgment concerns the protested summons for confirmation of grant. By consent of the learned counsels for the parties the contested summons for confirmation of grant was heard by way of written submissions. The 2nd Administrator’s submissions were filed on 31/05/2016 while those of the 1st Administrator were filed on 06/09/2016. I have considered the respective submissions of the parties. I have also read the affidavits on record.
5. It is not in dispute that the Deceased died intestate. It is also not in dispute that he was survived by a widow (the 2nd Administrator) and a child (W). A deceased person’s surviving father is not an automatic heir of such deceased if he was survived by a spouse and child (such as the present case). The 1st Administrator has not demonstrated why or how he is entitled to share in the estate of the Deceased.
6. In the event I will confirm the grant herein and direct that the net estate of the Deceased (which appears to consist only of some money) shall go absolutely to the 2nd Administrator, L W M, so that she is able to take care of herself and her child, F A W K. It is so ordered. Parties shall bear their own costs of the proceedings. DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2017
H P G WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2017