[2020] KEHC 7193 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 7193 (KLR)

The court determined that neither party's proposal for distribution of the estate was acceptable as presented. The objector's proposal was found to be outrageous and inequitable, while the petitioner's proposal lacked sufficient detail regarding the acreage of the properties. Given the polygamous status of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 7193 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Richard Rich Ichani; Applicant: Redempta Imujaro
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration 1 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
Outcome
Administrator ordered to value commercial properties and file a proposed distribution in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act within six months; failure to comply will result in automatic revocation of the grant; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
KW Kiarie
Legal Topics
Succession, Intestate Estate Distribution, Polygamous Estate, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Intestate Estate Distribution Polygamous Estate Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Rich Ichani

Respondent

Redempta Imujaro

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate

  1. 1 Whether the estate of Charles Etyang Ichani should be distributed according to the proposals of the petitioner or the objector.
  2. 2 Whether the distribution should comply with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act given the polygamous nature of the deceased's family.
  3. 3 Whether the administrator should be compelled to value commercial properties and ascertain acreage before distribution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that neither party's proposal for distribution of the estate was acceptable as presented. The objector's proposal was found to be outrageous and inequitable, while the petitioner's proposal lacked sufficient detail regarding the acreage of the properties. Given the polygamous status of the deceased, the court held that section 40 of the Law of Succession Act governs the distribution, requiring division among the houses based on the number of children and surviving wives. The court ordered the administrator to value the commercial properties and ascertain the acreage of all relevant parcels before filing a proposed distribution in compliance with the statutory...

Court Disposition

Administrator ordered to value commercial properties and file a proposed distribution in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act within six months; failure to comply will result in automatic revocation of the grant; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Administrator to value commercial properties within six months.
  • Administrator to file a proposed distribution in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act.