[2018] KEHC 2183 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner and his brother, being sons of Meto and not related to the deceased Chesimet Arap Sitonik, are not beneficiaries of the estate. The only connection between the petitioners and the deceased was a historical business relationship involving a jointly operated posho mill, which did...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2183 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kibet Arap Kirui; Respondent: Ezekiel Chesimet; Respondent: Musa Chesimet
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bomet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 194 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Objection to Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- Objection to confirmation of grant upheld; petitioners found not to be beneficiaries; estate to be distributed among objectors and named beneficiaries.
- Judges
- GO Shikwe
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Beneficiary Entitlement, Land Registration, Probate and Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kibet Arap Kirui
Applicant
Ezekiel Chesimet
Respondent
Musa Chesimet
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Objection to Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner and his brother are beneficiaries of the estate of Chesimet Arap Sitonik.
- 2 Whether the objectors are the rightful beneficiaries of parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858.
- 3 Whether prior business relationships create a beneficial interest in the estate land.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner and his brother, being sons of Meto and not related to the deceased Chesimet Arap Sitonik, are not beneficiaries of the estate. The only connection between the petitioners and the deceased was a historical business relationship involving a jointly operated posho mill, which did not create any proprietary interest in the land. The land in question, parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858, was registered solely in the name of the deceased, and there was no evidence that Meto ever contested this ownership during his lifetime. The court further noted that the subdivision order obtained by the petitioners from the Bomet Land Disputes Tribunal was overturned on...
Court Disposition
Objection to confirmation of grant upheld; petitioners found not to be beneficiaries; estate to be distributed among objectors and named beneficiaries.
Orders
- The petitioners are not beneficiaries of the estate of Chesimet Arap Sitonik.
- The estate, comprising parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858, shall be distributed among Ezekiel Chesimet, Musa Chesimet, Grace C. Chesimet, and Mary Chesimet.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
50 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BOMET
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 194 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF
CHESIMENT ARAP SITONIK...................................DECEASED
-AND-
KIBET ARAP KIRUI................................................PETITIONER
-VERSUS-
EZEKIEL CHESIMET.........................................1ST OBJECTOR
MUSA CHESIMET..............................................2ND OBJECTOR
RULING
Grant of letters of administration were issued by this court on 20th day of July 2016.
An affidavit of protest against confirmation of grant was filed in court on 30th May 2017 by the objectors Ezekiel Chesimet and Musa Chesimet.
It is deponed that the late Chesimet Arap Sitonik whose estate is in contention died intestate on 26th February 1993 at Kapsimbiri village.
It is contended that the petitioner Kibet Arap Kirui and his brother Kipkemoi Arap Kirui are not related to the objectors as they are sons of the late Melo who is a resident of Kesabita village Kyogong.
It is contended that Chesimet Arap Sitonik occupied the land in dispute in the year 1935 before land adjudication commenced in the country.
Sometimes around 1955 the Deceased allowed Meto to carry out a joint business of grinding maize in the parcel in dispute which business they carried till 1960’s when the type of posho mills they were using became obsolete in the wake of the introduction of new ones.
It is further deponed that during the adjudication process in the year 1969, the deceased Arap Sitonik was registered as the owner of parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858 measuring about 3. 5 acres. At the time Meto, the father of the petitioner was alive and did not challenge ownership of the land now in dispute.
That the Deceased used and occupied the land in dispute peaceably till his death on 26/2/93.
After his death the objectors used the land till 2008 when the petitioner and his brother commenced suits claiming a share therein.
The correct beneficiaries are:
1. Ezekiel Chesimet
2. Musa Chesimet
3. Grace C. Chesimet
4. Mary C. Chesimet
Who should occupy 0. 35 hectares each.
The petitioner in his affidavit in reply depones that he filed the succession cause on behalf of the Meto family.
That Meto was a shareholder in land parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858 and together with the deceased co-owned the posho mill and the land in dispute and that it is the deceased who secretly registered the land in his name in 1987.
Further that in Misc Application No. 91 of 2008 Kericho Principal Magistrate’s Court elders verdict was adopted as the order of the court which was to the effect that parcel No.Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858 be subdivided into two. The objectors did not appeal within the period stipulated in law and on 4th November 2010 the objectors were served with a letter from the District Surveyor to be present during subdivision as per the court order.
There is a further affidavit of the objectors wherein Ezekiel Chesimet had deponed that the deceased was the absolute owner of parcel L.R No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858 and that the decision of the magistrate in adopting the elders verdict was appealed at the provincial land dispute tribunal at Nakuru and judgment given in their favour and the ruling by Bomet Land Disputes Tribunal was quashed.
Analysis and conclusion
It is not in dispute that parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/8958 is registered in the name of Chesimet Arap Sitonik the Deceased.
It is not in dispute that the petitioner Kibet Arap Kirui and his brother Kipkemoi Arap Kirui are not related to the Deceased Chesimet Arap Sitonik. They are not beneficiaries to the Estate of the Deceased.
Their claim to the Estate is founded on the business relationship which existed between their father one Meto and the Deceased.
The two jointly operated traditional posho mills at parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858. These posho mills became obsolete after the introduction of modern ones.
It is instructive to note that there is no evidence to the effect that Chesimet Arap Sitonik and Meto jointly owned the parcel of land in dispute. Chesimet Arap Sitonik passed on on 26th February 1993 while Meto the father of the petitioners died in the year 1995. There is no evidence to the effect that during his life time Meto the father of the petitioners had contested ownership of parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858.
It is only after the death of the two old men that the sons of Meto who are the petitioners, in this cause went before Bomet Land Disputes Tribunal in the year 2009 and obtained orders of subdivision. These orders were appealed against vide appeal No. 40 of 2009 at the Provincial Land Disputes Appeal Committee at Nakuru and the decision of Bomet Land Disputes Board was overturned.
The petitioners are not the beneficiaries of the Estate of the Deceased which comprises of parcel No. Kericho/Kapsimbiri/858.
The rightful beneficiaries are
1. Ezekiel Chesimet
2. Musa Chesimet
3. Grace C. Chesimet
4. Mary Chesimet
An application for succession to be filed with the names and distribution as above.
Costs to the objectors.
Ruling delivered dated and signed in open court this 13th November 2018 in the presence of learned counsel for objector Mr. Kenduiwa, petitioner in person present.
Court assistant Mr. Rotich.
M. MUYA
JUDGE
13/11/18