[2025] KEHC 3211 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 3211 (KLR)

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the prayer for monthly maintenance of the minor from the estate proceeds, as such applications must be made before the Children Court under the current law. The application was brought under the repealed Children Act, 2001, and thus could not be entertained by the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 3211 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: [Names of the Applicants not specified]; Respondent: [Name of Respondent not specified]
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2845 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Maintenance and Accounts
Outcome
Application partly allowed.
Judges
PM Nyaundi
Legal Topics
Child Maintenance, Guardianship, Duties of Administrator, Estate Accounts
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Child Maintenance Guardianship Duties of Administrator Estate Accounts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[Names of the Applicants not specified]

Applicant

[Name of Respondent not specified]

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Maintenance and Accounts

  1. 1 Whether the High Court (Family Division) can grant orders for monthly maintenance of a minor from estate proceeds under the repealed Children Act, 2001.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent, as administrator, should be compelled to render accounts for the estate of the deceased.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the prayer for monthly maintenance of the minor from the estate proceeds, as such applications must be made before the Children Court under the current law. The application was brought under the repealed Children Act, 2001, and thus could not be entertained by the probate court, whose mandate is limited to identifying assets, beneficiaries, and distributing the estate. However, the court found that the Respondent, as administrator, is statutorily obligated under Section 83 of the Law of Succession Act to render full and accurate accounts of the estate. The Respondent's failure to respond to the application and provide accounts warranted...

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed.

Orders

  • Prayer for monthly maintenance from estate proceeds is declined for want of jurisdiction and improper legal basis.
  • Respondent is ordered to furnish the court with full and accurate accounts of the estate from 16th September 2016 to 31st December 2024 within 45 days.