[2021] KEHC 6134 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6134 (KLR)

The court found that the deceased's estate, being that of a polygamous intestate, must be distributed in accordance with Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act. This provision requires that the estate be divided among the houses based on the number of children in each house, with the surviving widow counted as an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 6134 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Albert Mang’oli Wawire; Respondent: Carolyne Nabwile Wawire
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration 14 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Judgment
Outcome
Estate distributed equally between the two houses in accordance with Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act; each party to bear their own costs.
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Succession, Intestate Estate, Polygamous Estate Distribution, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Intestate Estate Polygamous Estate Distribution Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Albert Mang’oli Wawire

Applicant

Carolyne Nabwile Wawire

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Judgment

  1. 1 How should the estate of a polygamous intestate be distributed among the houses and beneficiaries under Kenyan law?
  2. 2 Whether the distribution proposed by either party complies with Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the deceased's estate, being that of a polygamous intestate, must be distributed in accordance with Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act. This provision requires that the estate be divided among the houses based on the number of children in each house, with the surviving widow counted as an additional unit. The court rejected the applicant's proposal, which disproportionately favored the 1st house, and instead adopted the respondent's approach of dividing each parcel of land equally between the two houses. The court then ordered that each house receive half of each property, to be further distributed among the respective beneficiaries. This method ensures...

Court Disposition

Estate distributed equally between the two houses in accordance with Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act; each party to bear their own costs.

Orders

  • Each of the ten parcels of land to be divided equally between the 1st and 2nd houses, with each house receiving half of each property.
  • Further distribution within each house to be in accordance with the rules set out in Sections 35 to 38 of the Law of Succession Act.