[2023] KEHC 21483 (KLR)
The court held that only the holder of a grant of representation, that is, an administrator, has the legal capacity to file a summons for confirmation of grant under section 71(1) of the Law of Succession Act and rule 40(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. Since Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso was not an...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 21483 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso; Respondent: Setephen Okelo Omungweso; Respondent: Jackson Omukunda Nyikuli
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 252 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- Summons for confirmation of grant struck out for want of capacity; parties to bear own costs.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Confirmation of Grant, Administrator Capacity, Estate Distribution, Probate Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso
Applicant
Setephen Okelo Omungweso
Respondent
Jackson Omukunda Nyikuli
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person who is not an administrator has capacity to file a summons for confirmation of grant.
- 2 Whether the summons for confirmation of grant filed by Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso is competent.
- 3 What is the proper procedure for filing a summons for confirmation of grant under the Law of Succession Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that only the holder of a grant of representation, that is, an administrator, has the legal capacity to file a summons for confirmation of grant under section 71(1) of the Law of Succession Act and rule 40(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. Since Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso was not an administrator and did not hold a grant, he lacked the requisite capacity to file the application for confirmation of grant. The court further reasoned that the duty to account for the administration of the estate and to propose distribution lies exclusively with the administrator, as estate assets vest in the administrator by operation of law. Therefore, the summons for confirmation of...
Court Disposition
Summons for confirmation of grant struck out for want of capacity; parties to bear own costs.
Orders
- The summons for confirmation of grant dated February 12, 2019, is struck out.
- A proper summons for confirmation of grant to be filed by the administrators, Setephen Okelo Omungweso and Jackson Omukunda Nyikuli.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
In re Estate of Daniel Omungweso Omudeku (Deceased) (Succession Cause 252 of 2013) [2023] KEHC 21483 (KLR) (1 August 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 21483 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kakamega
Succession Cause 252 of 2013
WM Musyoka, J
August 1, 2023
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DANIEL OMUNGWESO OMUDEKU (DECEASED)
Ruling
1. The administrators of the estate of the deceased herein are Setephen Okelo Omungweso and Jackson Omukunda Nyikuli, who were appointed by letters of administration intestate made herein onJuly 5, 2013, and the grant issued to them, dated July 8, 2013. I revoked that grant by my orders of October 24, 2018. The revocation orders were unmade by a consent, recorded on October 22, 2019, whose effect was to reinstate the grant made on July 5, 2013.
2. The summons for confirmation of grant, dated February 12, 2019, was purportedly filed by Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso and Stepehen Okello Omungweso. Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso is not an administrator of the estate herein. He appears to be the sole applicant, for Stepehen Okello Omungweso, an administrator, filed an affidavit of protest, sworn on October 29, 2019, opposing the proposals in the summons, dated February 12, 2019. It is highly unlikely that he would file a protest to his own summons for confirmation. Since the summons, dated February 12, 2019, was filed by Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso, who was not an administrator, it is incompetent. He holds no grant, which can be confirmed on an application filed at his instance.
3. Section 71(1) of the Law of Succession Act, cap 160, Laws of Kenya, and rule 40(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules, provide that the summons for confirmation of grant shall be made by the holder of the grant. For avoidance of doubt, the 2 provisions state as follows :“After the expiration of a period of six months, or such shorter period as the court may direct under subsection (3), from the date of any grant of representation, the holder thereof shall apply to the court for confirmation of the grant in order to empower the distribution of any capital assets.”“where the holder of a grant which has not been confirmed seeks confirmation of the grant, he shall apply for such confirmation by summons in Form 108 in the cause in which the grant was issued…”
4. The application for confirmation of grant is not just about approving a distribution proposal. Under section 83 of the law of Succession Act, one of the duties of the administrator is to render an account to the court, of the administration, at about the same time when the confirmation application is mounted. The relevant provision states as follows:“83(e) Personal representatives shall have the following duties…within six months from the date of the grant, to produce to the court a full and accurate inventory of the assets and liabilities of the deceased and a full and accurate account of all dealings therewith up to the date of the account.”
5. The duty to account for an administration lies only with an administrator, a person who is not an administrator, cannot account under section 83 of the Law of Succession Act, for the assets of the estate are only vested in the administrator, by virtue of section 79 of the Law of Succession Act. The fact of the vesting of the assets in the administrator, creates in the administrator a corresponding duty to render an account, of his handling of the said assets. Butsotso/Shibeye/572 does not vest in Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso, he cannot propose its distribution, and even if confirmation orders were granted in his favour, he does not have the powers, under section 82, to have it transmitted to the beneficiaries.
6. As the summons, dated February 12, 2019, is at the instance of a person who has no capacity to file it, it is hereby struck out. Let a summons for confirmation of grant be properly filed by the persons who hold the grant herein, Setephen Okelo Omungweso and Jackson Omukunda Nyikuli. Each party to bear their own costs. It is accordingly ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA ON THIS 1STDAY OF AUGUST 2023WM MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Erick Zalo, Court Assistant.AppearancesMr. Mango, instructed by DSG Mango & Company, Advocates for Wycliffe Nandwa Omungweso.Mr. Khayumbi, instructed by JJ Khayumbi & Company, Advocates for Setephen Okelo Omungweso.