[2021] KEHC 12991 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had not demonstrated that they were the legal representatives of the estate of the late Margaret Magiri, as previously directed by Justice Ali-Aroni. Without such legal capacity, the applicants lacked locus standi to bring the application for revocation or amendment of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 12991 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Mbiri Gachoka; Applicant: Lucas Kairu Wairimu (as the administrators of the Estate of Margaret Magiri (Deceased)); Respondent: Stephen Kaguku Mariba
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 346 of 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Revoke or Amend Confirmed Grant
- Outcome
- application struck out for want of locus standi; no order as to costs
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Grant Revocation, Locus Standi, Estate Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Mbiri Gachoka
Applicant
Lucas Kairu Wairimu (as the administrators of the Estate of Margaret Magiri (Deceased))
Applicant
Stephen Kaguku Mariba
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Revoke or Amend Confirmed Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have locus standi to seek revocation or amendment of the confirmed grant issued to the respondent.
- 2 Whether the applicants have complied with previous court directives regarding legal representation of the estate of Margaret Magiri.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to the orders sought in relation to LR No. Kiganjo/Kiganjo/110.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had not demonstrated that they were the legal representatives of the estate of the late Margaret Magiri, as previously directed by Justice Ali-Aroni. Without such legal capacity, the applicants lacked locus standi to bring the application for revocation or amendment of the confirmed grant. The court emphasized that compliance with the earlier directive to obtain legal representation was a prerequisite for pursuing the matter. As the applicants had merely refiled the same application without fulfilling this requirement, the court struck out the application for want of locus standi and made no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
application struck out for want of locus standi; no order as to costs
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 16th July 2020 is struck out.
- No orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 346 OF 1986
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DANIEL WAINAINA GACHOKA
alias DANIEL MARIBA GACHOKA (DECEASED)
JOHN MBIRI GACHOKA
LUCAS KAIRU WAIRIMU (as the administrators of the Estate of
MARGRET MAGIRI (Deceased)) ...........................APPLICANTS
VERSUS
STEPHEN KAGUKU MARIBA ............................RESPONDENT
RULING
(1) Before this Court is the Notice of Motion dated 16th July 2020 in which JOHN MBIRI GACHOKA & LUCAS KAIRU WAIRIMU (as administrators of the Estate of MARGARET MAGIRI) (hereinafter ‘the Applicants’) seek the following orders:-
1. SPENT
2. SPENT
3. The Honourable Court be pleased to order that the Confirmed Grant issued to STEPHEN KAGUKU MARIBA be revoked.
4. In the alternative, the Honourable Court be pleased to order that he confirmed grant issued to STEPHEN KAGUKU MARIBA be amended or rectified to remove half of the LR No. Kiganjo/Kiganjo/110 from the assets of the estate of DANIEL WAINAINA GACHOKA alias DANIEL MARIBA GACHOKA.
5. The Respondent be compelled to sign the mutation and transfer forms hiving off half of LR No. Kiganjo/Kiganjo/110 to the personal representatives of the Estate of Margaret Magiri (Deceased), failing which the Deputy Registrar of this Honourable Court to sign the said the mutation and transfer forms.
6. The costs of this application be provided for.
(2) The Application was premised upon Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act, and Rule 44(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules and was supported by the Affidavit sworn on 16th July 2020 by the 1st Applicant JOHN MBIRI GACHOKA and the 2nd Applicant LUCAS KAIRU WAIRIMU.
BACKGROUND
(3) This cause relates to the estate of MARGARET MAGIRI (the Deceased) who in High Court Civil Case No. 1554 of 1989 was declared to have acquired by way of adverse possession a half share in the property known as Title L.R. No. Kiganjo/Kiganjo/110. The Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No. 188 of 2002upheld the decision of the High Court that the Deceased and her children were entitled to equal proportions in the estate of DANIEL WAINAINA GACHOKA alias DANIEL MARIBA GACHOKA.
(4) The Applicant alleges that despite being fully aware of the above decisions the Respondent proceeded to sub-divide the said parcel of land to his immediate family to the exclusion of the beneficiaries of MARGARET MAGIRI (the Deceased) in effect disinheriting them. Hence the present application.
(5) The Respondent despite having been served with the present application failed to file any reply thereto.
ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION
(6) The application was disposed of by way of written submissions. The Applicants filed in Court their written submissions dated 28th January 2021.
(7) I have carefully considered this application, the Affidavit in Support as well as the annextures thereto. It is evident that the Applicants did file another application dated 28th June 2019 seeking similar orders. In a ruling delivered on 27th February 2020, Hon. Lady Justice Ali-Aroni delivered a Ruling in which she stated as follows:-
“6. I have considered the matter and do concur with the Respondent on the Applicants capacity to bring this application as they are neither the representatives of the estate of Margaret Magiri (Deceased) nor the estate of Kibe Mariba (Deceased) though I note that the Applicants may have a genuine claim nonetheless.
7. Consequently, I will decline the application for now. The Applicants be at liberty to re-apply as the application is not yet determined on merit once they obtain legal capacity.”
(8) The Applicants have not demonstrated that they are the legal representatives of the estate of the late Margaret Magiri. As such the Applicants have failed to comply with the directives given by Justice Ali-Aroni in her Ruling of 26th February 2020. All they have done is to file the same application once again. The orders sought in this application cannot be granted to the Applicants until the orders of Justice Ali-Aroni have been complied with. Only then will the Applicants have the requisite locus standi to pursue this matter. In the circumstances I do hereby strike out the Notice of Motion dated 16th July 2020 and make no orders on costs.
DATED IN NAIROBI THIS 7TH DAY OF MAY, 2021.
…………………………………..
MAUREEN A. ODERO
JUDGE