[2023] KEHC 20222 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 20222 (KLR)

The court held that succession proceedings are not suits in the same sense as those under the Civil Procedure Act and Rules, and therefore the Law of Succession Act and the Probate and Administration Rules do not provide for the joinder of interested parties. The application to be enjoined as an interested party was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 20222 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ms. Gona (Gona J’Adungo & Company, Advocates); Respondent: Ms. Nabulindo (Nabulindo & Company, Advocates)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 257 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Joinder as Interested Party
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Joinder of Parties, Probate and Administration, Interested Party Applications
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Proceedings Joinder of Parties Probate and Administration Interested Party Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms. Gona (Gona J’Adungo & Company, Advocates)

Applicant

Ms. Nabulindo (Nabulindo & Company, Advocates)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Joinder as Interested Party

  1. 1 Whether succession proceedings allow for a party to be added as an interested party.
  2. 2 Which is the correct term to use between 'enjoined' and 'joined' in applications seeking to add parties to a cause.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that succession proceedings are not suits in the same sense as those under the Civil Procedure Act and Rules, and therefore the Law of Succession Act and the Probate and Administration Rules do not provide for the joinder of interested parties. The application to be enjoined as an interested party was therefore unnecessary and misconceived. The applicant, or any person seeking to intervene in a probate matter, should simply file the relevant application for the court to consider on its own merits, without seeking leave to be added as a party. The use of the term 'enjoin' was also found to be incorrect in this context, as it does not refer to the addition of parties to a cause.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application to be enjoined as an interested party is dismissed.
  • The applicant may file any application they have in mind for the court to deal with on its own merits.