[2021] KEHC 9532 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9532 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent, Joshua Asenah Odongo, deliberately misled the court by falsely stating that only two grandsons survived the deceased, thereby concealing the existence of the applicant, a biological daughter, and other children. The respondent failed to obtain the necessary consent or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9532 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Robai Asigo Esemere; Respondent: Joshua Asenah Odongo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
grant revoked
Judges
BA Mitullah
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Fraudulent Non Disclosure, Priority of Administration, Intestate Succession, Land Inheritance
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Revocation of Grant Fraudulent Non Disclosure Priority of Administration Intestate Succession Land Inheritance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robai Asigo Esemere

Applicant

Joshua Asenah Odongo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts and false statements.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant, as a biological daughter of the deceased, was unlawfully excluded from the succession proceedings and inheritance.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent was entitled to priority in petitioning for administration of the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent, Joshua Asenah Odongo, deliberately misled the court by falsely stating that only two grandsons survived the deceased, thereby concealing the existence of the applicant, a biological daughter, and other children. The respondent failed to obtain the necessary consent or renunciation from the applicant, who ranked first in priority to administer the estate. The petition also failed to disclose all assets and beneficiaries, rendering the proceedings defective and irregular. The respondent's conduct, including the unexplained delay in seeking confirmation of the grant and the use of a skeleton file, further demonstrated a lack of fitness to act as...

Court Disposition

grant revoked

Orders

  • The grant of letters of administration issued on 24th August 2000 is revoked.
  • A copy of this ruling to be sent to the ODPP for consideration of prosecution for perjury and/or intermeddling with the estate.