[2025] KEHC 4130 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 4130 (KLR)

The court found that the application, though styled as a rectification under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act, in substance sought a substantive amendment to the certificate of confirmation of grant by including assets omitted at the time of confirmation. Since section 74 and Rule 43 only permit rectification...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 4130 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joyce Chemaiyo Bett; Applicant: John Kitilit Bett; Respondent: Other beneficiaries (not individually named)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 46 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification/amendment of Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application allowed. Amended certificate of confirmation of grant to issue as per consent.
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Succession and Administration, Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Amendment of Decree
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Succession and Administration Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Amendment of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joyce Chemaiyo Bett

Applicant

John Kitilit Bett

Applicant

Other beneficiaries (not individually named)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification/amendment of Certificate of Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant can be rectified to include assets omitted at the time of confirmation.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be determined under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act or under the Civil Procedure Act provisions for amendment of decrees.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of all beneficiaries justifies the amendment of the certificate of confirmation of grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application, though styled as a rectification under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act, in substance sought a substantive amendment to the certificate of confirmation of grant by including assets omitted at the time of confirmation. Since section 74 and Rule 43 only permit rectification for minor errors, the court held that the appropriate legal basis for the amendment was section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as read with Rule 73(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. The court exercised its discretion to adopt the consent of all beneficiaries as a judgment, finding that the new evidence (the omitted...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Amended certificate of confirmation of grant to issue as per consent.

Orders

  • The consent on distribution of the estate is adopted as a judgment of the court.
  • An amended certificate of confirmation of grant shall issue in accordance with the consented schedule of assets and distribution.