[2021] KEHC 1040 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 1040 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that certain assets belonging to the deceased were inadvertently omitted from the confirmed grant. The court noted that the applicant had provided documentary evidence, including a title deed, to support the inclusion of the omitted property. There being no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 1040 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: David Mukuba Gitari (Deceased); Applicant: Administrator of the Estate of David Mukuba Gitari
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 18 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
summons for rectification of grant allowed
Judges
JK Mulwa, RM Mwongo
Legal Topics
Succession, Rectification of Grant, Omitted Assets, Probate, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Rectification of Grant Omitted Assets Probate Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Mukuba Gitari (Deceased)

Respondent

Administrator of the Estate of David Mukuba Gitari

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration should be rectified to include omitted assets and correct errors in the schedule of assets.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to warrant rectification of the grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that certain assets belonging to the deceased were inadvertently omitted from the confirmed grant. The court noted that the applicant had provided documentary evidence, including a title deed, to support the inclusion of the omitted property. There being no objection to the application, and in accordance with Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules, the court held that the rectification of the grant was merited. The court therefore allowed the summons for rectification in terms of the prayers sought, thereby amending the grant to include the omitted assets and correct the errors as...

Court Disposition

summons for rectification of grant allowed

Orders

  • The grant of letters of administration is rectified to include Barclays Bank – Kerugoya branch, A/c No. 2022xxxx.
  • The grant is rectified to include property Ngariawa/Ngiriama 3866 F (0.70 Ha).