[2019] KEHC 1866 (KLR)
The court found that there was no evidence that the respondent had been properly served with notice of the inter partes hearing date. Proceeding in the absence of the respondent, who had not been notified, would be unjust and contrary to the principles of fair hearing. The court therefore declined to determine the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 1866 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Nyikuri Olwika (Deceased); Respondent: __MISSING__
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 473 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application; Service of Hearing Notice in Dispute
- Outcome
- Hearing adjourned; application not determined on merits.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Fair Hearing Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Nyikuri Olwika (Deceased)
Applicant
__MISSING__
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application; Service of Hearing Notice in Dispute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was properly served with notice of the inter partes hearing date.
- 2 Whether it is just to proceed in the absence of the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no evidence that the respondent had been properly served with notice of the inter partes hearing date. Proceeding in the absence of the respondent, who had not been notified, would be unjust and contrary to the principles of fair hearing. The court therefore declined to determine the application on the merits and directed that the matter be set down for hearing afresh after proper service on the respondent.
Court Disposition
Hearing adjourned; application not determined on merits.
Orders
- The matter shall be allocated another date for hearing.
- The respondent shall be properly served with notice of the hearing date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 473 OF 1996
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID NYIKURI OLWIKA (DECEASED)
RULING
1. I am called upon to determine an application dated 19th July 2019. The same was placed before me under certificate of urgency on 24th July 2019. I directed that it be served, for inter partes hearing on 25th September 2019. It would appear that the application was served, for there is a replying affidavit on record filed herein on 22nd August 2019.
2. When the matter came up for hearing, Mr. Mutokaa informed me that he had served and pointed to an affidavit of service on record. He then proceeded to argue the application.
3. In the process of preparing the ruling herein, I have looked at the affidavit of service filed on 25th September 2019. It returns copy of the certificate of urgency dated 23rd July 2019. There is nothing to indicate that the respondent was made aware that the matter was to come up for inter partes hearing on 25th September 2019. The respondent was not in court on 25th September 2019, and I take the view that he had not been notified of the date.
4. In the circumstances, I take the position that it would be unjust to make a determination of the matter based on proceedings that were conducted in the absence of the respondent who had not been properly served.
5. The matter shall be allocated another date for hearing. The respondent shall be properly served with notice of that hearing date.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE