[2021] KEHC 5548 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5548 (KLR)

The court found that the litigation regarding the distribution of Loc.20/Kambirwa/477 should have ended with the rectified grant issued in conformity with the Court of Appeal judgment. The respondents' failure to cooperate by providing documents and executing forms constituted an unjustified obstruction to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5548 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Mwangi Thiong'o; Respondent: Francis Mwangi Thiong'o; Respondent: Jecinta Wanjiku Mwangi Thiong'o; Respondent: Paul Waithaka Thiong'o; Respondent: Samuel Muiruri Thiong'o; Respondent: Esther Mwithaga Thiong'o
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Murang'a
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 338 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Summons for Execution and Distribution of Estate
Outcome
Application allowed with directions for compliance and enforcement; no order as to costs.
Judges
K Kimondo
Legal Topics
Succession, Administration of Estates, Grant Confirmation, Distribution of Property, Life Interest, Court Orders Enforcement
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Administration of Estates Grant Confirmation Distribution of Property Life Interest Court Orders Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Mwangi Thiong'o

Applicant

Francis Mwangi Thiong'o

Respondent

Jecinta Wanjiku Mwangi Thiong'o

Respondent

Paul Waithaka Thiong'o

Respondent

Samuel Muiruri Thiong'o

Respondent

Esther Mwithaga Thiong'o

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Summons for Execution and Distribution of Estate

  1. 1 Whether the administrator should be authorized to execute documents on behalf of the respondents for distribution of Loc.20/Kambirwa/477 as per the confirmed grant and Court of Appeal judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the Land Registrar should dispense with the production of passport photographs, PIN Certificates, and the original title deed from the respondents.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents have obstructed the distribution of the estate contrary to the rectified grant and appellate orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the litigation regarding the distribution of Loc.20/Kambirwa/477 should have ended with the rectified grant issued in conformity with the Court of Appeal judgment. The respondents' failure to cooperate by providing documents and executing forms constituted an unjustified obstruction to the lawful distribution of the estate. The court held that to give effect to the appellate orders and the rectified grant, it was necessary to compel the respondents to comply within a specified period, failing which the Deputy Registrar would be authorized to execute all necessary documents on their behalf. The Land Registrar was also empowered to dispense with the respondents'...

Court Disposition

Application allowed with directions for compliance and enforcement; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • All respondents shall within 21 days provide the original title, copies of identity cards, PIN certificates, and passport size photographs to the administrator/applicant and execute all necessary forms for subdivision and transfer of the suit property as per the Court of Appeal judgment and rectified grant.
  • In default of compliance, the Deputy Registrar of the High Court shall execute all necessary documents on behalf of the five respondents to distribute Loc.20/Kambirwa/477 in accordance with the Court of Appeal judgment and rectified grant.