[2024] KEHC 15571 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 15571 (KLR)

The court determined that the application, though styled as a rectification, was in substance a review requiring the identification and inclusion of additional assets discovered after the initial confirmation of grant. The limited procedure under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act was insufficient for such...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 15571 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Wanjiru Wahome; Applicant: Juliet Wairimu Wahome
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kilgoris
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application allowed; certificate of confirmation of grant to be amended to include additional assets and distributed equally among beneficiaries.
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Omitted Assets, Trust for Minors
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Confirmation of Grant Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Omitted Assets Trust for Minors

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Wanjiru Wahome

Applicant

Juliet Wairimu Wahome

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Certificate of Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant should be amended to include assets of the deceased's estate that were omitted during the initial confirmation process.
  2. 2 Whether the additional assets should be distributed in the same manner as previously confirmed assets, including holding minors' shares in trust.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the application, though styled as a rectification, was in substance a review requiring the identification and inclusion of additional assets discovered after the initial confirmation of grant. The limited procedure under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act was insufficient for such substantive amendments. However, since the application was unopposed and the proposed distribution was in equal shares, the court found it just and proper to allow the amendment. The court ordered that the omitted assets be included in the schedule of the certificate of confirmation of grant and distributed equally among the beneficiaries, with minors' shares held in trust by the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; certificate of confirmation of grant to be amended to include additional assets and distributed equally among beneficiaries.

Orders

  • The assets listed in the application are declared estate property.
  • The schedule attached to the certificate of confirmation of grant dated 08/03/2023 shall be amended to include the additional assets.