[2020] KEHC 10250 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 10250 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to disclose the existence of prior succession proceedings in Eldoret High Court, where the applicants had already been appointed administrators and the estate had been distributed. The respondent also failed to notify or involve the applicants and other beneficiaries,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 10250 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rakeri Wangeci Nderitu; Applicant: Julius Njuguna; Respondent: Lucy Wanjiku
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
application allowed; grant revoked
Judges
RB Ngetich
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Non Disclosure of Material Facts, Succession Procedure, Beneficiary Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Non Disclosure of Material Facts Succession Procedure Beneficiary Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rakeri Wangeci Nderitu

Applicant

Julius Njuguna

Applicant

Lucy Wanjiku

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained by false statement or concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants, as administrators appointed in a prior succession cause, were denied participation in the proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to disclose the existence of prior succession proceedings and the true list of beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to disclose the existence of prior succession proceedings in Eldoret High Court, where the applicants had already been appointed administrators and the estate had been distributed. The respondent also failed to notify or involve the applicants and other beneficiaries, despite being aware of their interests as evidenced by the chief's letter. The court held that the grant was obtained through concealment of material facts and non-disclosure, which is a ground for revocation under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. The respondent's actions amounted to abuse of court process, and the applicants were denied their right to participate in the...

Court Disposition

application allowed; grant revoked

Orders

  • Application dated 14th August 2019 is hereby allowed.
  • Grant issued to respondent on 27th June 2016 and confirmed on 2nd February 2018 is hereby revoked.