[2019] KEHC 6285 (KLR)
The court found that the Objector/Applicant, as a principal party to the objection proceedings, was entitled to personally cross-examine the 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness. The inadvertent allowance of cross-examination by co-administrators in place of the Objector/Applicant did not satisfy the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 6285 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Achapa Akello; Respondent: Harrison Ouma Akelo; Respondent: Herine Akinyi Akelo; Respondent: Emmanuel Omondi Akelo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 84 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Cross Examine Administrator
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Evidence by co-administrators' cross-examination expunged. 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness to be recalled for cross-examination by Objector/Applicant.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Cross Examination, Right to Fair Hearing, Administration of Estates, Revocation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Achapa Akello
Applicant
Harrison Ouma Akelo
Respondent
Herine Akinyi Akelo
Respondent
Emmanuel Omondi Akelo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Cross Examine Administrator
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Objector/Applicant should be granted leave to cross-examine the 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness.
- 2 Whether evidence taken in cross-examination by co-administrators in place of the Objector/Applicant should be expunged from the record.
- 3 Whether denial of cross-examination would violate the Objector/Applicant's right to a fair hearing.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Objector/Applicant, as a principal party to the objection proceedings, was entitled to personally cross-examine the 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness. The inadvertent allowance of cross-examination by co-administrators in place of the Objector/Applicant did not satisfy the requirements of a fair hearing as enshrined in Article 50(1) of the Constitution. The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act to ensure the ends of justice were met. Consequently, the evidence obtained through cross-examination by the co-administrators was expunged from the record, and the 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness were...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Evidence by co-administrators' cross-examination expunged. 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness to be recalled for cross-examination by Objector/Applicant.
Orders
- The evidence by the 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness taken in cross-examination by the co-administrators is expunged from the record.
- The 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness shall be recalled for cross-examination by the Objector/Applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
42 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 84 OF 1998
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD OKELO NYANGÓR (DECEASED)
BETWEEN
ROBERT ACHAPA AKELLO.............................OBJECTOR/APPLICANT
AND
HARRISON OUMA AKELO.....1ST ADMINISTRATOR/RESPONDENT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF HARRISON OUMA AKELO,
HERINE AKINYI AKELO AND
EMMANUEL OMONDI AKELO....................JOINT ADMINISTRATORS
RULING ON APPLICATION DATED MADE BY THEOBJECTOR/APPLICANTON 08TH APRIL, 2019
TO CROSS-EXAMINE THE 1ST ADMINISTRATOR/RESPONDENT
Background
1. HARRISON OUMA AKELO (hereinafter referred to as the1stAdministrator/Respondent)was issued with letters of administration of estate of EDWARD OKELO NYANGÓR (hereinafter referred to as the deceased)on 08th May, 1998.
2. The 1st Administrator/Respondent was issued with a Certificate of Confirmation of the grant in his favour on 24th June, 2002.
Application
3. ROBERT ACHAPA AKELO (hereinafter referred to as theObjector/Applicant) on 19th December, 2016 filed a Notice of Motion dated 28th October, 2016 and filed moved the court seeking revocation of the letters of administration issued to the 1st Administrator/Respondent.
4. On 21st March, 2017, I gave directions that the objection be heard by way of viva voceevidence.
5. When the cause came up for hearing on 08th March, 2018 and after the Objector/Applicant had partially testified, I gave orders revoking the letters of administration and the grant issued in favour of the 1st Administrator/Respondent. With the consent of the parties, the Administrator/Respondent, Herine Akinyi Akelo and Emmanuel Omondi Akelo were appointed 1st, 2nd and 3rd Administrators of deceased’s estate respectively representing each of the deceased’s 3 houses.
6. The hearing resumed on 08th April, 2019 staring with the 1st Administrator/Respondent’s case. though served did not oppose the application or attend court when it came up for hearing on 6th May, 2019. The 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness were cross-examined by the 2nd and 3rd administrators.
7. On that day, Mr. Odongo for the 1st Administrator/Respondent applied for an adjournment and when the Objector/Applicant asked for leave to cross-examine the 1st Administrator/Respondent which Mr. Odongo opposed and I reserved the ruling.
8. I have considered the application in the light of Order 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules relating to hearing of suit and examination of witnesses. The main parties to these objection proceedings are essentially the Administrator/Respondent and the Objector/Applicant. I acknowledge that there was an inadvertence on the part of the court in allowing the co-administrators to cross-examine the 1st Administrator/Respondent and his witness in place of the Objector/Applicant who’s the main party to this cause.
9. The provisions of Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act gives this court inherent power to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice to be met. Ends of justice cannot be seen or be said to be met if the Objector/Applicant is denied a right to a fair hearing guaranteed by Article 50(1) of the Constitution.
10. Accordingly, for reasons set out above, the Court makes the following orders:
1)The evidence by the1stAdministrator/Respondent and his witness taken in cross-examination by the co-administrators is expunged from the record
2)The1stAdministrator/Respondent and his witness shall be recalled for cross-examination by theObjector/Applicant
3)Any other witness that the 1stAdministrator/Respondent shall present will mutatis mutandis be cross-examined by theObjector/Applicant
4)The Objector/Applicant shall present his case and if he so wishes may call the 2nd and 3rd Administrators or any other person as his witness.
11. It is hereby ordered
DELIVERED AND SIGNED IN KISUMU THIS 27thDAY OF June, 2019
T. W. CHERERE
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Court Assistant-Felix
Objector/Applicant- Present
1stAdministrator/Respondent - N/A
2ndAdministrator - N/A
3rd Administrator - N/A
For the 1stAdministrator/Respondent - Mr. Kaniaru hb for Mr. Odongo