[2024] KEHC 6753 (KLR)
The court found that the administrators had failed to act on the confirmed grant for nearly five years, rendering the grant inoperative and useless. The death of one administrator, who was also a beneficiary, further complicated the administration, as the confirmed grant could not be used to distribute the estate,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 6753 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jonathan Sijenyi Manase; Applicant: George Manasseh Olwero; Applicant: Mary Adhiambo Owith; Applicant: Florence Rebecca Olwero
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 586 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Ex Parte Application to Substitute Deceased Administrator and for Further Orders
- Outcome
- grant revoked; file closed; beneficiaries to seek fresh grant in proper jurisdiction
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Succession Grants, Revocation of Grant, Estate Distribution, Administrator Substitution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jonathan Sijenyi Manase
Applicant
George Manasseh Olwero
Applicant
Mary Adhiambo Owith
Applicant
Florence Rebecca Olwero
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Ex Parte Application to Substitute Deceased Administrator and for Further Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the confirmed grant should be revoked due to inaction and death of one administrator.
- 2 Whether the estate can be distributed under the current grant after the demise of an administrator who was also a beneficiary.
- 3 Whether the beneficiaries should be directed to seek a fresh grant in the appropriate jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the administrators had failed to act on the confirmed grant for nearly five years, rendering the grant inoperative and useless. The death of one administrator, who was also a beneficiary, further complicated the administration, as the confirmed grant could not be used to distribute the estate, particularly land held in trust. The absence of an alternative mode of distribution and the likelihood of further applications for substitution of beneficiaries led the court to conclude that the only viable remedy was to revoke the grant. The court invoked Section 76(d)(i) of the Law of Succession Act to revoke the grant and directed the living beneficiaries to petition for a...
Court Disposition
grant revoked; file closed; beneficiaries to seek fresh grant in proper jurisdiction
Orders
- The grant issued on 16th October 2013 and confirmed on 29th July 2019 is revoked under Section 76(d)(i) of the Law of Succession Act.
- The living beneficiaries are directed to petition for a fresh grant before Siaya High Court, the geographical jurisdiction where the deceased was domiciled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
In re Estate of Eliakim Manas Ongango (Deceased) (Succession Cause 586 of 2008) [2024] KEHC 6753 (KLR) (5 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6753 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Succession Cause 586 of 2008
RE Aburili, J
June 5, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION BY JONATHAN SIJENYI MANASE, GEORGE MANASSEH OLWERO, MARY ADHIAMBO OWITH and FLORENCE REBECCA OLWERO – PETITIONERS/APPLICANTS
Ruling
1. I have considered the application dated 8th May 2024 which is made exparte. The grant was issued on 16th October 2013 and confirmed on 29th July 2019, in favour of 4 administrators.
2. It is now deposed that the 1st Petitioner Jonathan Sijenyi Manase is deceased as per the death certificate annexed, issued on 30th June 2023.
3. He died aged 82 years old on 27th April 2023 due to stroke.
4. No doubt, the 1st Administrator was aged but the questions is, why did the administrators obtain a grant and sit on it after it was confirmed way back on 29th July 2019 nearly 5 years ago and six years after it was issued to them in 2013, without distributing the estate of the deceased as required by law and filing into court true and accurate accounts as stipulated in Section 83 of the Law of Succession Act.
5. In my humble view, the grant as issued and confirmed has not made any difference to the estate of the deceased Eliakim Manas Ong’ang’o as it is not expected that the estate of the deceased Eliakim Manase Ongango would be pending distribution five years after confirmation of the said grant.
6. As the administrators went to slumber with the conformed grant, and for laches, I decline the invitation to grant the orders sought.
7. Consequently, as the grant which was confirmed on 29th July 2019 became inoperational and useless, since it was never used to distribute the estate of the deceased, and for reasons that there is no alternative mode of distribution of the estate filed, with the demise of one of the administrators and being a beneficiary, meaning that the parties will still return to court to seek for other orders to substitute beneficiaries since the confirmed grant cannot be used to distribute the estate especially land which is held in trust by two of the beneficiaries on behalf of all the other beneficiaries.
8. Accordingly, I invoke Section 76 (d) (i) of the Law of Succession Act and revoke the grant issued on 16th October 2013 and confirmed on 29th July 2019.
9. The living beneficiaries are directed to petition for a fresh grant before Siaya High Court, the geographical jurisdiction wherein the deceased was domiciled as per the letter from the Chief, Central Gem Location.
10. Ruling to be typed and order extracted.
11. This file is closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 5THDAY OF JUNE, 2024R. E. ABURILIJUDGE