[2022] KEHC 11048 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 11048 (KLR)

The court held that only sales of land by the deceased himself prior to his death could be recognized and honored in the distribution of the estate. Any purported sales by the deceased's sons before confirmation of the grant were illegal and unenforceable, as they contravened Sections 45 and 83 of the Law of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 11048 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Edward Lingana Otiende; Respondent: Pauline Aliviza Otiende; Respondent: Rose Sinzore; Respondent: Milton Chokunzila Otiende
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 21B of 1994
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification and Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application for rectification and confirmation of grant allowed in part; grant rectified and confirmed; estate distributed as per court's directions.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Substitution of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Confirmation of Grant Substitution of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Lingana Otiende

Applicant

Pauline Aliviza Otiende

Respondent

Rose Sinzore

Respondent

Milton Chokunzila Otiende

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification and Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration should be rectified to substitute deceased administrators and beneficiaries with their successors.
  2. 2 Whether the grant should be confirmed and the estate distributed as proposed by the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether sales of estate land by beneficiaries before confirmation of grant are valid and enforceable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that only sales of land by the deceased himself prior to his death could be recognized and honored in the distribution of the estate. Any purported sales by the deceased's sons before confirmation of the grant were illegal and unenforceable, as they contravened Sections 45 and 83 of the Law of Succession Act. Since there was no consensus among the beneficiaries for an unequal distribution of the estate, and no valid reason was provided for such, the court applied Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, requiring equal distribution among the surviving children. The court ordered that the two sales by the deceased (3 acres to Harun Mugesia and 1 acre to Joshua Milimo) be...

Court Disposition

Application for rectification and confirmation of grant allowed in part; grant rectified and confirmed; estate distributed as per court's directions.

Orders

  • Grant of letters of administration rectified to substitute Edward Lingana Otiende as administrator in place of Aggrey Odanga.
  • Pauline Aliviza Otiende and Rose Sinzore substituted as beneficiaries in place of Aggrey Odanga and Joshua Sinzore respectively.