[2022] KEHC 13875 (KLR)
The High Court found that, although it had previously issued orders regarding the registration of the suit land in the joint names of the applicant and the 1st respondent, the core dispute now concerns ownership of the land. Under Article 162(2) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 13875 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mary Obiswa Korongo; Respondent: Jane Migarusha Karongo; Respondent: B.O.G Sango Secondary & Primary School
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 3 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
- Outcome
- Matter transferred for want of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- SN Riechi
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Courts, Land Ownership Disputes, Succession Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Obiswa Korongo
Applicant
Jane Migarusha Karongo
Respondent
B.O.G Sango Secondary & Primary School
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine ownership of the suit land parcel in the context of succession proceedings.
- 2 Whether the matter should be heard by the Environment and Land Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that, although it had previously issued orders regarding the registration of the suit land in the joint names of the applicant and the 1st respondent, the core dispute now concerns ownership of the land. Under Article 162(2) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, such disputes fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court. The High Court, therefore, lacks jurisdiction to entertain or determine the matter further. The appropriate course is to transfer the proceedings to the Environment and Land Court at Bungoma for hearing and final determination.
Court Disposition
Matter transferred for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- This matter is hereby transferred to the Environment and Land Court Bungoma for hearing and final determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
In re Estate of Elizabeth Mara W/O Karongo-Deceased (Succession Cause 3 of 2015) [2022] KEHC 13875 (KLR) (7 October 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 13875 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Bungoma
Succession Cause 3 of 2015
SN Riechi, J
October 7, 2022
Between
Mary Obiswa Korongo
Applicant
and
Jane Migarusha Karongo
1st Respondent
B.O.G Sango Secondary & Primary School
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. Upon perusing this matter, the followoing facts emerge;The applicant and the first respondent are both administrators of the estate pursuant to orders of HK Chemitei J issued on May 28, 2020.
2. Land parcel Bungoma/naitiri/183 was to be registered in the joint names of the applicant and the 1st respondent.
3. The parties were advised to pursue legal redress relating to ownership of the suit land in the Environment and land Court.
4. Both the applicant and the 1st respondent as well as the second respondent are in occupation of the parcel.
5. By instruments of transfer executed on December 22, 1992, the subject parcel was transferred to the deceased.
6. By letter dated January 30, 2020, the National Land Commission directed the land registrar Bungoma to prepare title deed in favour of the 2nd respondent in the name of cabinet secretary to the treasury to hold in trust.
7. According to a certificate of official search dated January 31, 2022, the subject parcel of land is now registered in the name of principal secretary to the treasury as trustee for the 2nd respondent.
8. I have taken note of the position posited by the 2nd respondent that the issues herein relate to ownership of the suit parcel of land and therefore a preserve of the Environment and Land Court.
9. The jurisdiction of that court is provided for under article 162(2) of the Constitution and section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act which are to the effect that the court shall have powers to hear matters relating to ownership of land. In this matter, the court rendered itself that the land be registered in the joint names of the applicant and the 2nd respondent. After the issue of the order, the land registrar was bound to comply with the order though the material on record shows that the order was not acted upon and or ignored by the land registrar.
10. In light of the above, I find and hold that this court having given orders in the manner afore stated, it is divested of jurisdiction to entertain the matter as this is ordinarily a preserve of the Environment and land court.
11. In the final result therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the matter which is hereby transferred to the Environment and Land Court Bungoma for hearing and final determination.
DATED AT BUNGOMA THIS 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022S.N. RIECHIJUDGE