[2018] KEHC 6903 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 6903 (KLR)

The High Court (succession division) lacks jurisdiction to determine disputes over ownership of land, which are properly within the mandate of the Environment & Land Court. The objectors, not being beneficiaries of the deceased's estate, had no legal standing to object to the grant of letters of administration or to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 6903 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Isaiah Ntong’ondu; Respondent: Zaberio Muturia M’Ituiri; Applicant: Henry Gituma Ebuthania; Applicant: Ezekiel Lilli M’Mailutha
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 447 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Inhibition, Injunction, and Leave to File Objection Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Jurisdiction of Court, Land Ownership Disputes, Revocation of Grant
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Succession Proceedings Jurisdiction of Court Land Ownership Disputes Revocation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaiah Ntong’ondu

Respondent

Zaberio Muturia M’Ituiri

Respondent

Henry Gituma Ebuthania

Applicant

Ezekiel Lilli M’Mailutha

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Inhibition, Injunction, and Leave to File Objection Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the High Court (succession division) has jurisdiction to determine disputes over ownership of L.R. Njia/Liburu/236.
  2. 2 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts.
  3. 3 Whether the objectors are entitled to orders of inhibition, injunction, and leave to file objection out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court (succession division) lacks jurisdiction to determine disputes over ownership of land, which are properly within the mandate of the Environment & Land Court. The objectors, not being beneficiaries of the deceased's estate, had no legal standing to object to the grant of letters of administration or to seek orders affecting the administration of the estate. The administrator was not required to disclose the existence of a pending land dispute to the succession court, as such matters are to be resolved in the appropriate forum. Consequently, the application for inhibition, injunction, cancellation of transfers, and leave to file objection out of time was dismissed for want of...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The objection dated 12th October 2016 is dismissed.
  • Costs of the application awarded to the respondents.