[2015] KEHC 7022 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 7022 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided unchallenged evidence, including affidavits from witnesses and a letter from the deceased's doctor, establishing that the deceased had full testamentary capacity in 2000 but suffered memory loss and diminished capacity from 2002 onwards. There was no evidence to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 7022 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Solomon Njuguna Munyutu; Respondent: Estate of Ephantus Munyutu Waigi (Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2732 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Grant Confirmation and Validity of Wills
Outcome
application granted
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Testamentary Capacity, Validity of Wills, Probate Review
Source Language
en
Family and Children Testamentary Capacity Validity of Wills Probate Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Solomon Njuguna Munyutu

Applicant

Estate of Ephantus Munyutu Waigi (Deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Grant Confirmation and Validity of Wills

  1. 1 Whether the deceased had testamentary capacity when executing the wills dated 12th January 2000, 24th November 2004, and 12th July 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the will dated 12th January 2000 is the only valid testamentary document.
  3. 3 Whether the grant was erroneously confirmed based on an invalid codicil.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided unchallenged evidence, including affidavits from witnesses and a letter from the deceased's doctor, establishing that the deceased had full testamentary capacity in 2000 but suffered memory loss and diminished capacity from 2002 onwards. There was no evidence to the contrary. The court concluded that the will dated 12th January 2000 was the only valid testamentary document, as the deceased lacked capacity to execute the 2004 and 2007 documents. The grant previously confirmed on the basis of the 2007 codicil was therefore erroneous. The application for review was granted in terms of the prayers sought, recognizing the 2000 will as the valid...

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The will dated 12th January 2000 is declared the last valid will of the deceased.
  • All subsequent wills and testamentary instruments dated 24th November 2004 and 12th July 2007 are declared invalid for want of capacity.