[2009] KEHC 145 (KLR)
The court found that the respondents, being merely dependants and not the surviving spouse or children, had no legal right to administer the estate of the deceased in priority to the applicant, who was the lawful wife. The grant was obtained secretly and without the applicant's consent, contrary to the requirements...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 145 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mary Lokusi Nasike; Applicant: Julias Lokusi Alimamoi; Respondent: Unnamed Petitioner (brother to deceased)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 21 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- application for revocation of grant allowed; grant revoked and/or annulled
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Revocation of Grant, Priority of Administration, Intestacy, Fraudulent Obtainment of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Lokusi Nasike
Applicant
Julias Lokusi Alimamoi
Applicant
Unnamed Petitioner (brother to deceased)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained fraudulently.
- 2 Whether the grant was obtained by means of untrue allegations of fact.
- 3 Whether the respondents had the legal right to administer the estate of the deceased in priority to the surviving spouse and children.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents, being merely dependants and not the surviving spouse or children, had no legal right to administer the estate of the deceased in priority to the applicant, who was the lawful wife. The grant was obtained secretly and without the applicant's consent, contrary to the requirements of the Law of Succession Act. The law gives priority to the surviving spouse and children in the administration of an intestate estate. The court therefore held that the grant was improperly obtained and should be revoked or annulled.
Court Disposition
application for revocation of grant allowed; grant revoked and/or annulled
Orders
- The grant of letters of administration issued to the respondent is revoked and/or annulled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KITALE
Succession Cause 21 of 2006
EREKAI EPETET LEMUYA.......................................DECEASED.
AND
MARY LOKUSI NASIKE )
JULIAS LOKUSI ALIMAMOI ) ................................APPLICANTS.
R U L I N G.
By an application by way of summons for revocation of grant or annulment of grant, dated 15th February, 2008, the applicant seeks orders that:-
(1)That the grant was obtained fraudulently.
(2)That the grant was obtained by means of untrue allegations of facts.
(3)That the grant was obtained secretly.
The application is predicated upon the annexed affidavit of Magret Arupe Ekutut sworn on 15th February, 2008.
On behalf of the applicant, it was argued that the late Eregai Epetet Lemuya who died on 28th April, 2005 was her legal husband.
The 1st respondent is a wife to the 2nd respondent herein as opposed to the deceased.
Moses Erekai is a son to the respondent herein as opposed to the deceased.
Rebecca Erekai Lemuya is the applicant’s daughter with the deceased.
In the premises the respondents herein have no right to administer the estate of the applicant’s late husband. That the Probate and Administration cause was filed secretly without her knowledge. She did not therefore consent to the making of the application for grant.
On behalf of the respondent, it was conceded that the petitioner is a brother to the deceased. That he took out the letters of administration by-passing the lawful wife and children of the deceased.
Section 66 of the Law of Succession Act (Cap 160)
Laws of Kenya lists in a hierarchical order the persons to whom grant of representation in intestacy can be made. It suffices to say that the surviving spouse has priority in applying for and being granted letters of administration (See In the matter of the Estate of Marathi Mwaria (deceased) Nairobi HCCC No. 875/2005 (KOOME – J)
Ranking in second priority are the surviving children of the deceased. The respondents herein are merely dependants. Hence they come a distant third. For those reasons this application succeeds. Accordingly, the grant is revoked and/or annulled.
Dated and delivered at Kitale this 12th day of November, 2009.
N.R.O. OMBIJA.
JUDGE.
J.M. Wafula for Applicant.