[2017] KEHC 9340 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate sufficient urgency or necessity to justify charging the estate property prior to confirmation of the grant. There was no evidence that the proposed loan was in the interest of the estate or that the estate would suffer prejudice if the application was not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 9340 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Josephine Wanjiku Wakanene; Applicant: Robert Mbuthia Wakanene; Respondent: Co-operative Bank Ltd.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 164 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Charge Estate Property Prior to Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Probate and Administration, Grant of Letters of Administration, Charging Estate Property
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Josephine Wanjiku Wakanene
Applicant
Robert Mbuthia Wakanene
Applicant
Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Charge Estate Property Prior to Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be allowed to charge the property Dagoretti/Karandini/44 to secure a loan before confirmation of grant.
- 2 Whether the application demonstrates urgency or necessity in the interest of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate sufficient urgency or necessity to justify charging the estate property prior to confirmation of the grant. There was no evidence that the proposed loan was in the interest of the estate or that the estate would suffer prejudice if the application was not granted. The deceased was only a co-proprietor of the property, and the applicants did not provide convincing reasons or obtain necessary consents. The application was therefore dismissed for lack of merit and urgency.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application to charge Dagoretti/Karandini/44 to Co-operative Bank Ltd. before confirmation of grant is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 164 OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ERICK KURIA WAKANENE (DECEASED)
RULING
1. Vide summons dated 14th day of July, 2017 filed on the same day pursuant to rules 59 and 73 of the Probate and Administration rules, the applicants sought orders that:
1. This application be certified urgent and be heard on priority basis.
2. This honourable court be pleased to issue an order allowing the applicants to charge the property known as Dagoretti/Karandini/44 to Co-operative Bank Ltd. for the beneficial interest of the estate of Harun Wakanene Mbuthia (deceased) before the grant is confirmed.
3. Costs of the application be in the cause.
2. Application is based on grounds on the face of it and a joint affidavit in support deposed on 14th July, 2017 by the applicants herein Josephine Wanjiku Wakanene and Robert Mbuthia Wakanene.
3. On 13th February, 2017, the applicants filed an application seeking special limited grant wherein they sought court orders allowing the applicants to charge the property referred to hereinabove to Co-operative bank for purposes of securing a loan. The court rejected the application and advised the applicants to petition for a full grant which they did and a grant of letters of administration intestate was issued to the applicants jointly on 30th June, 2017.
4. The applicants herein who are jointly registered in equal shares as owners of Dagoretti/Karandini/44 together with their mother Stella Wanjiku and the deceased in this proceedings, are seeking similar orders as those contained in the application dated 13th February, 2017 which was dismissed.
5. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants Mr. Kimani urged the court to consider the application in the interest of the estate.
6. I have considered application herein, affidavit in support and submissions by counsel for the applicants. Application is seeking orders authorizing the applicants/administrators to charge the property which constitutes the estate of the deceased to Co-operative Bank for purposes of securing a loan.
7. The applicants have not sufficiently demonstrated to the court why they cannot wait for the formal confirmation of the grant before processing a loan. There is no proof that the loan they want to secure using the property of the deceased is in the interest of the estate and that the estate stands to suffer if such orders are not made.
8. I do not find any urgency nor merit in the application. The deceased was a mere co-proprietor of the jointly owned property. He was not married nor did he have any children. The applicants are merely rushing the process of the court without any consent or convincing reasons for their own benefit and not the estate.
9. For the above stated reasons, application herein is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Order accordingly.
SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017.
J. N. ONYIEGO (JUDGE)
In the presence of
..................................................Counsel for the Applicants
...................................................Court Assistant