[2022] KEHC 15138 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 15138 (KLR)

The court found that the certificate of confirmation of grant erroneously captured the particulars of the beneficiaries and their respective shares in the estate of Esho Osidai. The evidence showed that Nabulu Ene Saitet had renounced her entitlement by affidavit, and the remaining beneficiaries had agreed to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 15138 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kakuresh Ole Kirotie; Applicant: Elijah Kirotie; Applicant: Jeremiah Rianto; Respondent: Nabulu Ene Saitet
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 16 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
summons for rectification of grant allowed; grant and certificate of confirmation rectified
Judges
SN Mutuku
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Succession, Beneficiary Entitlement
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Distribution of Estate Succession Beneficiary Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kakuresh Ole Kirotie

Applicant

Elijah Kirotie

Applicant

Jeremiah Rianto

Applicant

Nabulu Ene Saitet

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration and certificate of confirmation should be rectified to accurately reflect the beneficiaries and their respective shares in the estate of Esho Osidai.
  2. 2 Whether the distribution of 33.1 hectares from Kajiado/Kilonito/9 should be made equally among the three named beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the certificate of confirmation of grant erroneously captured the particulars of the beneficiaries and their respective shares in the estate of Esho Osidai. The evidence showed that Nabulu Ene Saitet had renounced her entitlement by affidavit, and the remaining beneficiaries had agreed to the proposed distribution. No objections or submissions were filed in opposition. The court held that it was just and proper to rectify the grant and certificate of confirmation to accurately reflect the correct beneficiaries and their equal shares in the 33.1 hectares portion of Kajiado/Kilonito/9. The rectification was therefore allowed, and the estate was ordered to be distributed...

Court Disposition

summons for rectification of grant allowed; grant and certificate of confirmation rectified

Orders

  • A portion measuring 33.1 hectares be hived from title number Kajiado/Kilonito/9 and distributed equally amongst Kakuresh Ole Kirotie, Elijah Kirotie, and Jeremiah Rianto, each to receive 11.03333 hectares.
  • A rectified certificate of confirmation to issue.