[2021] KEHC 3728 (KLR)
The court held that while the 1st Administrator is in principle entitled to reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in the administration of the estate, he failed to render a full and accurate account of the claimed Kshs. 2,000,000 expenses as required by law. Without such an account, the court found it...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 3728 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Miriam Kendi Muthui; Applicant: Catherine Kinya Muthui; Respondent: James Kimathi Muthui; Respondent: Lincoln Muthui Muita
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 398 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Rectification of Grant and Reimbursement of Expenses
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the 1st Administrator
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Succession Administration, Rectification of Grant, Estate Expenses, Distribution of Shares
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miriam Kendi Muthui
Applicant
Catherine Kinya Muthui
Applicant
James Kimathi Muthui
Respondent
Lincoln Muthui Muita
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Rectification of Grant and Reimbursement of Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant should be rectified to include SAFARICOM shares and distribute them to the 1st Administrator.
- 2 Whether the 1st Administrator is entitled to reimbursement of Kshs. 2,000,000 from the estate for expenses incurred.
- 3 Whether the orders issued on 18th March, 2021 should be stayed pending determination of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while the 1st Administrator is in principle entitled to reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in the administration of the estate, he failed to render a full and accurate account of the claimed Kshs. 2,000,000 expenses as required by law. Without such an account, the court found it premature to order payment from the estate, specifically from the SAFARICOM shares. The court also noted that the 1st Administrator had concealed the existence of the SAFARICOM shares, which remained undistributed, and that there was no justification for staying the previous court order of 18th March, 2021. Consequently, the application for rectification of the grant and...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the 1st Administrator
Orders
- The chamber summons dated 01st April, 2021 is dismissed.
- Costs to be borne by the 1st Administrator.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
42 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 398 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EUTYCUS MUTHUI (DECEASED)
BETWEEN
MIRIAM KENDI MUTHUI..........................................1ST APPLICANT
CATHERINE KINYA MUTHUI..................................2ND APPLICANT
AND
JAMES KIMATHI MUTHUI...........................1ST ADMINISTRATOR
LINCOLN MUTHUI MUITA..........................2ND ADMINISTRATOR
RULING
1. By chamber summons dated 01st April, 2021 and filed on 07th April, 2021, the 1st Administrator seeks orders THAT:
a)The Honourable be pleased to rectify the grant issued on 27th April, 2020 to include SAFARICOM SHARES- A/C NO.xxxxxxxxxxxand distribute the same to the Applicant
b)The Honourable be pleased to stay the orders issued on 18th March, 2021 pending the hearing and determination of this application
c)The Honourable be pleased to order that the costs and expenses incurred by the 1st Administrator in the process of preservation, protection and administration of the estate amounting to Kshs. 2,000,000/- be borne and payable by the estate of the deceased
d)Costs be in the cause
2. In an undated replying affidavit sworn and filed on 18th May, 2021 faults the 1st Administrator for not involving family members prior to expending his own resources, did not apply to rectify the grant to include the SAFARICOM SHARES and finally on the ground that this application is desired to delay the distribution of the estate.
3. In a rejoinder, the 1st Administrator by his supplementary affidavit sworn on 26th May, 2021 and filed on 27th May, 2021 contends that he has performed his duties and is by law entitled to recover his expenses.
Analysis and determination
4. I have considered the application in the light of the supporting affidavit, the replying affidavit and supplementary affidavit and submission on behalf of the parties.
5. I have also considered numerous rulings made in this matter. Of particular interest is a ruling dated 27th April, 2020 where the court noted at paragraph 14 dd that the beneficiaries were in agreement that the following shares be distributed to the 1st Administrator:
i. Nation Media group Ltd Acc No.xxxxxxx
ii. Centum Investment Co Ltd Acc No.xxxx
iii. Standard Chartered Bank Kenya Ltd Acc No.xxxx
iv. Ntimanyakiru Sacco Acc No.xxxx
v. Ntima Society Acc No.xxx
vi. Kengen Co Ltd. Acc No xxxxx
vii. Kenya Airways Ltd Acc No.xxxxx
viii. Mumias Sugar Co Ltd CDSC B/xxxxxxx/LI-0
6. It is worth noting that the 1st Administrator, well knowing that the deceased also owned SAFARICOM SHARES- A/C NO.xxxxxxxxxxxconcealed this information from the court and the same remains undistributed.
7. Section 83(c) and (d) of the Law of Succession Act requires administrators to pay out of the estate all the expenses of obtaining the grant and all other reasonable expenses of the administration and to ascertain and pay, out of the estate of the deceased, all his debts. (See In re Estate of Mukhobi Namonya (Deceased) [2020] eKLR).
8. Section 83 (e) requires the administrators to within six months from the date of the grant, produce to the court a full and accurate account of all dealings therewith up to the date of the account.
9. Whereas I am in agreement with the 1st Administrator that he is entitled to reimbursement of his expenses and litigation costs over assets forming the estate, he has to date not rendered an account of what these expenses were, how they were incurred and how they were settled. Consequently, I find that an order that the expenses be paid fromSAFARICOM SHARES is premature and cannot issue at this stage.
10. Having said that, I pronounce that the 1st Administrator does not stand to be prejudiced and no meaningful purpose will be served in staying this court’s order of 18th March, 2021 for the reason that the 1st Administrator concedes that the value of the undistributed SAFARICOM SHARES is sufficient to compensate his expenses once established.
11. Having considered the chamber summons dated 01st April, 2021 and filed on 07th April, 2021 as analysed above, I find that it has no merit and it is dismissed with costs to be borne by the 1st Administrator.
DATED AT MERU THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
WAMAE. T. W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Court Assistant -Morris Kinoti
For Applicants - M/s. Kevin Nyenyire & Co. Advocates
For 1st Respondent - N/A for M/s. Thangichia M.David Advocates
For 2nd Respondent - N/A