[2021] KEHC 5264 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5264 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate the continued necessity for letters of administration ad litem, did not provide sufficient evidence that she was the only person able to apply, and did not show that other family members consented to her substitution. The application lacked supporting...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5264 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lilian Musanga Meja; Petitioner: Michael Shitsama Chikukwa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 19 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Administrator Ad Litem
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
BA Mitullah
Legal Topics
Letters of Administration, Substitution of Administrator, Succession Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Letters of Administration Substitution of Administrator Succession Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lilian Musanga Meja

Applicant

Michael Shitsama Chikukwa

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Administrator Ad Litem

  1. 1 Whether there is still need for letters of administration ad litem in respect of the estate of Florah Shidakwa Muteshi.
  2. 2 Whether Lilian Musanga Meja is the only person able to apply for substitution as administrator ad litem.
  3. 3 Whether there is sufficient consent from other family members for the substitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate the continued necessity for letters of administration ad litem, did not provide sufficient evidence that she was the only person able to apply, and did not show that other family members consented to her substitution. The application lacked supporting documentation regarding the alleged civil case and did not explain the failure to seek a full grant. As a result, the court dismissed the application and directed the surviving family to petition for a full grant without further delay.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed.
  • File closed.