[2022] KEHC 3035 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 3035 (KLR)

The court found that Felix Kangethe Mbithi and Beatrice Njeri Kangethe were adequately provided for in the distribution of the estate, each receiving a quarter acre, and that the grant was properly issued and confirmed by consent of all family members. There was no evidence of defect or fraud in the grant process....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 3035 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Felix Kangethe Mbithi; Applicant: Beatrice Njeri Kangethe; Applicant: Charles Gatoto Thuku; Respondent: Edward Mbithi Kangethe; Respondent: Loise Gachiku Kinuthia; Respondent: Patrick Njenga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 118 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
All applications for revocation of grant dismissed.
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Grant Revocation, Beneficiary Entitlement, Trust Property, Land Distribution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Grant Revocation Beneficiary Entitlement Trust Property Land Distribution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Felix Kangethe Mbithi

Applicant

Beatrice Njeri Kangethe

Applicant

Charles Gatoto Thuku

Applicant

Edward Mbithi Kangethe

Respondent

Loise Gachiku Kinuthia

Respondent

Patrick Njenga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicants Felix Kangethe Mbithi and Beatrice Njeri Kangethe were excluded from inheritance of the deceased's estate.
  2. 2 Whether the grant issued and confirmed was defective or obtained by fraud.
  3. 3 Whether the purchaser, Charles Gatoto Thuku, can claim rights to the estate property through succession proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Felix Kangethe Mbithi and Beatrice Njeri Kangethe were adequately provided for in the distribution of the estate, each receiving a quarter acre, and that the grant was properly issued and confirmed by consent of all family members. There was no evidence of defect or fraud in the grant process. The claim by Charles Gatoto Thuku, based on a sale agreement with beneficiaries, could not be adjudicated in the succession cause, as the Law of Succession Act does not empower the probate court to determine third-party land ownership disputes. Such claims must be pursued in a separate civil suit. Consequently, all applications for revocation of the grant were dismissed.

Court Disposition

All applications for revocation of grant dismissed.

Orders

  • The applications dated 17th August and 25th September 2020 are dismissed with no order as to costs.
  • The application dated 29th September 2020 is dismissed with costs.