[2018] KEHC 5457 (KLR)
The court held that the applicant, as a purchaser from a beneficiary and not a beneficiary herself, lacked locus standi to seek review or setting aside of the grant in the estate of Francis Wafula Okullo. The Law of Succession Act governs the administration of estates and recognizes only beneficiaries or persons...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 5457 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Mary Okullo; Applicant: Roselida Nambiro; Interested Party: Elizabeth Lucy Mayende
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Probate & Administration 318 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration Application / Ruling on Application for Review or Setting Aside of Grant
- Outcome
- application dismissed for lack of locus standi
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Review of Grant, Beneficiary Rights, Purchaser From Beneficiary
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Okullo
Respondent
Roselida Nambiro
Applicant
Elizabeth Lucy Mayende
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Application / Ruling on Application for Review or Setting Aside of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant, as a purchaser from a beneficiary, has locus standi to seek review or setting aside of a grant in the estate of the deceased.
- 2 Whether the Law of Succession Act provides for the applicant's interests in the administration of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant, as a purchaser from a beneficiary and not a beneficiary herself, lacked locus standi to seek review or setting aside of the grant in the estate of Francis Wafula Okullo. The Law of Succession Act governs the administration of estates and recognizes only beneficiaries or persons with a direct interest as having capacity to move the court. The applicant's interests as a purchaser do not fall within the ambit of the Act, and any grievances she has must be pursued against the beneficiary who sold her the land, not the estate. Consequently, the court declined to consider the merits of the application and dismissed it for want of standing.
Court Disposition
application dismissed for lack of locus standi
Orders
- The application dated 28th March 2015 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BUSIA
PROBATE & ADMINSTRATION NO. 318 OF 2014
IN THE ESTATE OF:FRANCIS WAFULA OKULLO.....DECEASED
BETWEEN
MARY OKULLO...................PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT
AND
ELIZABETH LUCY MAYENDE.......INTERESTED PARTY
VERSUS
ROSELIDA NAMBIRO................OBJECTOR /APPLICANT
RULING
1. ROSELIDA NAMBIRO, the applicant herein filed an application dated 28thMarch 2015 for a review or setting aside of the grant issued herein on 15th December 2014. The application is brought under Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Rules 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules. It is premised on the following grounds:
a) That vide the certificate of confirmation of grant issued herein on 21st May 1996, Elizabeth Lucy Mayende was given a portion of L.R No. BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/4153 measuring 6 acres.
b) That L.R.NO. BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/4153 was consequently subdivided into L.R. NO. BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/755,7556 and 7557.
c) That L.R. NO. BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/7555 was registered in the name of the petitioner, L.R. NO. BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/7556 was registered in the name of Elizabeth Mayende, L.R.NO. BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/7557 was registered in the name of Shadrack Okulo Mayende while LR NOBUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/7557 was registered in the name of Shadrack Okulo.
d) That Elizabeth Mayende LR.NO.BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/7556 to be sub divided into 3 portions namely BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/7644 7645 and 7646.
e) That the said Elizabeth Lucy Mayende sold to the applicant LR NO. BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/7664 and 7645 and the applicant has title to the said parcels of land and is in actual possession thereof.
f) That the petitioner has moved the court to rectify the grant with a view of reducing the share of Elizabeth Lucy Mayende to 3 acres and introducing Onesmas Wandera Munyende as holder of a portion measuring one acre out of LR NO. BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/4153.
g) That there is an error apparent in the face of record as correction made did not relate to errors in names and descriptions or in setting gout the time and place of the deceased’s death or the purpose of a limited grant as envisaged under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act.
h) That Elizabeth Lucy Mayende having sold her entire entitlement to the applicant had nothing in her possession to surrender to the petitioner.
2. The application was opposed by MARY AKUKU OKULLO, the petitioner/respondent on the following grounds:
a) That the applicant is a stranger to the estate ofFRANCIS WAFULA OKULLO,her late deceased husband.
b) That the applicant is not a beneficiary to the said estate.
c) That the applicant was a purchaser from a beneficiary.
3. Even before we can embark in an exercise to establish whether the rectification was merited or not, we must first address the issue of locus standi,lest it be an exercise in futility. The applicant herein is a purchaser from a beneficiary. Since she is not a beneficiary in the estate of FRANCIS WAFULA OKULLO,she lacks capacity to move the court for orders in respect of the estate. The estate does not owe her any duty. If she has an issue to raise, she can only do so against the person who sold land to her. Section 2 (1) of the law of Succession Act provides as follows:
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Act or any other written law, the provisions of this Act shall constitute the law of Kenya in respect of, and shall have universal application to, all cases of intestate or testamentary succession to the estates of deceased persons dying after, the commencement of this Act and to the administration of estates of those persons.
From the foregoing section, the interests of the applicant herein do fall under the ambit of the Law of Succession Act.
4. Having made a finding that the applicant lacks locus standi to make the application she has brought, I will not comment on its merits or otherwise for this will not add any value.
5. The application is therefore dismissed with costs.
DELIVERED and SIGNED at BUSIA this 17th day of July, 2018
KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
JUDGE