[2019] KEHC 5365 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was entitled to the fruits of the judgment following the confirmation of the grant. The respondent's refusal to execute the necessary documents for sub-division and transfer of the estate land was unjustified and amounted to a denial of justice. Since the application was unopposed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 5365 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James G. Mbogo; Respondent: __MISSING__
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 682 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Post Confirmation Application for Execution of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed as prayed
- Judges
- LW Gitari
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Execution of Grant, Land Subdivision, Court Orders, Non Compliance With Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James G. Mbogo
Applicant
__MISSING__
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Post Confirmation Application for Execution of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should authorize the executive officer to execute documents for sub-division and transfer of the estate land due to the respondent's refusal to cooperate.
- 2 Whether the Land Registrar should be authorized to dispense with statutory requirements for registration due to non-cooperation by the respondent.
- 3 Whether security should be provided during the sub-division process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was entitled to the fruits of the judgment following the confirmation of the grant. The respondent's refusal to execute the necessary documents for sub-division and transfer of the estate land was unjustified and amounted to a denial of justice. Since the application was unopposed and the facts were clear, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application as prayed, authorizing the executive officer to execute the required documents, the Land Registrar to dispense with statutory requirements, and the OCS to provide security during the sub-division process. This ensured the effective administration of the estate and protected the applicant's...
Court Disposition
application allowed as prayed
Orders
- The executive officer of the court is authorized to execute all necessary documents to facilitate sub-division and transfer in respect to Land Parcel No. Kabare/Njuku/79.
- The Land Registrar is authorized to dispense with passport photos, KRA Pins certificate, copies of identity card and the old title deed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 682 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GACHOKI KAMUNYU Alias NDAMBIRI WANDIRWE (DCD)
AND
JAMES G. MBOGO............................................................ADMINISTRATOR
RULING
1. The application pending before Court is dated 27/09/2018 whereby the applicant is seeking for the following orders;
a) The Honourable Court do authorize the executive officer of the Court to execute all necessary documents to facilitate sub-division and transfer in respect to Land Parcel No. Kabare/Njuku/79.
b) The Land Registrar is authorized to dispense with passport photos, KRA Pins certificate, copies of identity Card and the old Title deed.
c) OCS Wang’uru to provide security during sub-division of Land Parcel No. Kabare/Njuku/79.
2. The application was based on the ground that the grant was confirmed on 28/04/2018 but the respondent has refused to execute all the necessary documents to facilitate sub-division and transfer in respect to Land Parcel No. Kabare/Njuku/79. That he has severally requested the respondents but they have refused and it is for this reason, he is asking for security during the sub-division of the said land.
3. The respondents though served with the application did not file any response.
4. The petitioner has a right to enjoy the fruits of the judgment delivered in his favour and to deny him the same would be unfair and denial of justice. The application is not opposed. It is necessary to allow the application to facilitate the execution of the grant. I order that the application is allowed as prayed.
Dated at Kerugoya this 18th day of July 2019.
L. W. GITARI
JUDGE