[2020] KEHC 9549 (KLR)
The court found that the respondents, as administrators, breached their fiduciary duties by failing to provide an account of the rental income, neglecting the maintenance of estate property, failing to service the estate's loan, and not providing for the beneficiaries' needs. This conduct endangered the estate's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 9549 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Pauline Wambui Kamau; Applicant: Anastacia Wanjiku Kamau; Applicant: Irene Wanjiru Kamau; Respondent: Lucy Wanjuhi Kamau; Respondent: Francis Ngugi Kamau
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 52 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Appointment of Co Administrator
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Fiduciary Duties, Grant of Letters of Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pauline Wambui Kamau
Applicant
Anastacia Wanjiku Kamau
Applicant
Irene Wanjiru Kamau
Applicant
Lucy Wanjuhi Kamau
Respondent
Francis Ngugi Kamau
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Appointment of Co Administrator
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents breached their fiduciary duties as administrators of the estate.
- 2 Whether the 1st applicant should be appointed as a co-administrator of the estate.
- 3 Whether the respondents failed to account for rental income and estate management.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents, as administrators, breached their fiduciary duties by failing to provide an account of the rental income, neglecting the maintenance of estate property, failing to service the estate's loan, and not providing for the beneficiaries' needs. This conduct endangered the estate's assets and failed to comply with statutory obligations under the Law of Succession Act. The court accepted the applicants' evidence and determined that the appointment of the 1st applicant as co-administrator was necessary to protect the estate and ensure proper management. The court ordered that rental proceeds be managed jointly by all three administrators and recalled the...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Pauline Wambui Kamau is appointed as co-administrator of the estate alongside the respondents.
- The proceeds of rent from Muguga/Muguga/T.258 shall be held in a joint account operated by the three administrators.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 52 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEOFFREY KAMAU GITUERE – (DECEASED)
PAULINE WAMBUI KAMAU.......................................1ST APPLICANT
ANASTACIA WANJIKU KAMAU...............................2ND APPLICANT
IRENE WANJIRUKAMAU............................................3RD APPLICANT
VERSUS
LUCY WANJUHI KAMAU.........................................1ST RESPONDENT
FRANCIS NGUGI KAMAU.......................................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The deceased Geoffrey Kamau Gitwere died on 26th November 2014. In his life, he married Mary Wakonyo (who died) with whom he had five children:-
a. Olive Wambui;
b. Lucy Wanjiru Kamau;
c. Leah Wangari;
d. Marion Wanjiku; and
e. Anthony Gituere Kamau.
He then married the second wife Lucy Wanjuhi Kamau (the 1st respondent) with whom he got the following children:-
a. Rose Nyambura Kamau;
b. Pauline Wambui Kamau (the 1st applicant);
c. Anastasia Wanjiku Kamau (2nd applicant);
d. Irene Wairimu Kamau (3rd applicant);
e. Alice Wanjiru Kamau;
f. Damaris Njeri Kamau;
g. Francis Ngugi Kamau (2nd respondent); and
h. David Gituere Kamau.
2. The respondents were on 17th December 2015 issued with a grant of letters of administration intestate. There is on record an application for the confirmation of the grant. The applicants (and their brother) challenged the proceedings on the basis that the deceased had died testate, having left a valid written Will dated 28th October 2014. On 8th March 2018 this court directed that there be an oral hearing to determine whether or not the deceased left a valid written Will. This was after the said Will was challenged by the respondents.
3. One of the properties in the estate of the deceased is Muguga/Muguga/T.258 which is developed with tenants. It earns rental income which the respondents are in charge of. On 8th March 2018 the court directed that, within 30 days from that date, the respondents do provide an accurate account and inventory of the income from the property and how they have applied the same. It is not disputed that the deceased had taken a loan on the property from Equity Bank Limited. The account was to show how the loan was being serviced. It is clear that the respondents have since not filed the inventory and account.
4. On 15th March 2019 the applicants brought the present application in which they asked that the 1st applicant be made a co-administrator. This was because the respondents have intermeddled with the estate of the deceased to the extent that it was wasting away. They alleged that Muguga/Muguga/T.258 was not being renovated, and therefore the tenants had moved out; the respondents were collecting Kshs.450,000/= monthly from the 40 tenants but were not paying electricity, collecting garbage or maintaining the premises and this was what was causing the tenants to vacate. They alleged that the respondents were not servicing the Equity Bank loan which had accumulated arrears of Kshs.1,900,000/= and there was threat by the bank to exercise its statutory power of sale. Lastly, they stated that Alice Wanjiru Kamau and Damaris Njeri Kamau were each in the University and needed fees which the respondents were not paying.
5. The application was served but did not attract any response.
6. I accept the sworn evidence contained in the supporting affidavit. I find that the respondents are in breach of their fiduciary responsibility to the estate and the beneficiaries, as required under sections 82 and 83of the Law of Succession Act (Cap 160).They have allowed the property of the estate to go to waste, and have not provided for the beneficiaries. Their conduct has caused the plot to be threatened with sale by the bank.
7. Consequently, I allow the application and appoint Pauline Wambui Kamau as a co-administrator of the estate of the deceased, along with the respondents. The proceeds of the rent from Muguga/Muguga/T.258 shall be held in the joint account to be opened and operated by the three administrators. I recall the grant issued to the respondents, to enable the issuance of a fresh grant in the three names.
8. Costs of the application shall be borne by the respondents in their personal capacities.
DATED and DELIVERED electronically, following consent of the parties, at NAIROBI this 30THday of APRIL 2020
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE