[2021] KEHC 7800 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7800 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent, as administrator, blatantly disregarded a valid court order on the distribution of the deceased's estate by unilaterally subdividing and registering LR. NO. ABOGETA/U-KIONGONE/123 in his own name. The court emphasized that court orders are not to be ignored and that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7800 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: James Kinoti Thuranira; Applicant: Silas Kaburu Thuranira; Respondent: Kenneth Muriithi M’Thuranira; Respondent: Onesmus Gitobu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 464 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Cancellation of Subdivision and Rectification of Estate Records
Outcome
Application allowed; subdivision cancelled; estate to be restored; respondent to complete administration as per amended grant; costs to applicant.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Breach of Administrator Duties, Land Subdivision, Rectification of Land Records
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Administration of Estates Confirmation of Grant Breach of Administrator Duties Land Subdivision Rectification of Land Records

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Kinoti Thuranira

Respondent

Silas Kaburu Thuranira

Applicant

Kenneth Muriithi M’Thuranira

Respondent

Onesmus Gitobu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Cancellation of Subdivision and Rectification of Estate Records

  1. 1 Whether the administrator/respondent irregularly subdivided and transferred estate property in violation of a court order.
  2. 2 Whether the subdivision and registration of LR. NO. ABOGETA/U-KIONGONE/123 should be cancelled and the estate restored.
  3. 3 Whether the administrator should be compelled to complete administration in accordance with the amended grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent, as administrator, blatantly disregarded a valid court order on the distribution of the deceased's estate by unilaterally subdividing and registering LR. NO. ABOGETA/U-KIONGONE/123 in his own name. The court emphasized that court orders are not to be ignored and that the respondent's actions demonstrated untrustworthiness in administering the estate. Consequently, the court allowed the application, ordered cancellation of the subdivision, restoration of the estate to its original status, and directed the respondent to complete administration in accordance with the amended certificate of confirmation of grant. The court further provided for the Deputy...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; subdivision cancelled; estate to be restored; respondent to complete administration as per amended grant; costs to applicant.

Orders

  • Cancellation of subdivision of LR. NO. ABOGETA/U-KIONGONE/123 into LR. NO. ABOGETA/U-KIONGONE/4612 and 4613.
  • Land Registrar, Meru to rectify the record and restore the estate to LR. NO. ABOGETA/U-KIONGONE/123.