[2024] KEHC 1463 (KLR)
The court found that the application for stay of execution was unopposed and, upon considering the applicant's averments and the supporting affidavit, determined that it was appropriate to preserve the subject matter of the appeal. The court exercised its discretion to grant a stay of execution of the orders dated...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 1463 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Tsilla Nkirote; Respondent: Zipporah Karambu Muthomi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 160 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution granted.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Confirmation of Grant, Beneficiary Status, Appeals, Administration of Estates
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tsilla Nkirote
Applicant
Zipporah Karambu Muthomi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the orders dated 27th April, 2013 pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if the stay is not granted.
- 3 Whether the respondent will suffer prejudice if the stay is granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for stay of execution was unopposed and, upon considering the applicant's averments and the supporting affidavit, determined that it was appropriate to preserve the subject matter of the appeal. The court exercised its discretion to grant a stay of execution of the orders dated 27th April, 2013, pending the hearing and determination of Nyeri Civil Appeal No. E107 of 2023, in order to ensure that the appeal would not be rendered nugatory and to balance the interests of both parties. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution granted.
Orders
- Orders in ruling dated April 27, 2013 are stayed pending hearing and determination of Nyeri Civil Appeal No. E107 of 2023.
- Costs shall be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
In re Estate of Gideon Muthomi M'Tierandu (Deceased) (Succession Cause 160 of 1997) [2024] KEHC 1463 (KLR) (15 February 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 1463 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Succession Cause 160 of 1997
TW Cherere, J
February 15, 2024
N THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GIDEON MUTHOMI M’TIERANDU (DECEASED) AND IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION
Between
Tsilla Nkirote
Administratrix
and
Zipporah Karambu Muthomi
Protestor
Ruling
1. By summons for confirmation filed on 05th September, 2022, Tsilla Nkirote (Administratrix/Applicant) applied to distribute deceased’s estate to among others herself.
2. Prior to the hearing of that application, an issue arose concerning whether the Administratrix/Applicant was a wife of deceased and beneficiary of his estate.
3. By a ruling dated 27th April, 2013, this court ruled that the Administratrix/Applicant was neither a wife of the deceased nor a beneficiary of deceased’s estate but that the children borne out of her relationship with deceased were beneficiaries.
4. By summons dated 20th September, 2023, Administratrix/Applicant seeks stay of orders dated 27th April, 2013 pending hearing and determination of Nyeri Civil Appeal No. E107 of 2023. The summons is supported by an affidavit sworn by Administratrix/Applicant on 20th September, 2023 in which she avers that she is wife and beneficiary of the deceased and that she will suffer substantial loss if the orders sought are not granted and that Respondents do not stand to suffer any prejudice if the application is allowed. Annexed to the supporting affidavit is a notice of appeal filed on 08th May, 2023.
5. Courts have severally held that the power to grant an order of stay pending appeal is discretionary as was observed by the Court of Appeal in RWW v EKW (2019) eKLR that:“The purpose of an application for stay of execution pending an appeal is to preserve the subject matter in dispute so that the rights of the appellant who is exercising the undoubted right of appeal are safeguarded and the appeal if successful, is not rendered nugatory. However, in doing so, the court should weigh this right against the success of a litigant who should not be deprived of the fruits of his/her judgment. The court is also called upon to ensure that no party suffers prejudice that cannot be compensated by an award of costs. Indeed, to grant or refuse an application for stay of execution pending appeal is discretionary. The Court when granting the stay however, must balance the interests of the Appellant with those of the Respondent.”
6. Having considered the application herein which is unopposed, it is hereby ordered that the orders in ruling dated April 27, 2013 be and are hereby stayed pending hearing and determination of Nyeri Civil Appeal No. E107 of 2023.
7. Costs shall be in the cause
DATED AT MERU THIS 15th DAY OF February 2024T. W. CHEREREJUDGEAppearanceCourt assistants - Kinoti/MuneneFor Applicant - Mr. Otieno for Otieno Obwanda & Co. AdvocatesFor Protestor - Mr. Mwanzia for Muia Mwanzia & Co. Advocates