[2019] KEHC 1584 (KLR)
The court found that the applications for substitution of deceased beneficiaries with their legal representatives were merited, as the law allows rectification of grants to correct errors or mis-descriptions, including changes in beneficiaries due to death. The court also held that the administrator’s refusal to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 1584 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Faith Kagwiria Kiringo; Respondent: Gediel Kiriki Kiringo; Objector: Mary Nkatha; Objector: Lucy Nkirote
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 261 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Rectification of Grant and Administrative Orders
- Outcome
- All applications allowed as prayed.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Grant, Substitution of Beneficiaries, Administration of Estates, Probate and Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Faith Kagwiria Kiringo
Applicant
Gediel Kiriki Kiringo
Respondent
Mary Nkatha
Objector
Lucy Nkirote
Objector
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Rectification of Grant and Administrative Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should allow substitution of deceased beneficiaries with their legal representatives in the confirmed grant.
- 2 Whether the court should order rectification of the certificate of confirmation of grant to reflect the substitutions.
- 3 Whether the court should authorize the Deputy Registrar to sign requisite documents and dispense with the production of the original title deed due to the petitioner’s non-cooperation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applications for substitution of deceased beneficiaries with their legal representatives were merited, as the law allows rectification of grants to correct errors or mis-descriptions, including changes in beneficiaries due to death. The court also held that the administrator’s refusal to surrender the original title deed was unjustified and impeded the implementation of the confirmed grant. Since the applications were unopposed and the facts were not disputed, the court exercised its jurisdiction to grant the orders sought, including authorizing the Deputy Registrar to sign the necessary documents and dispensing with the requirement for the original title deed....
Court Disposition
All applications allowed as prayed.
Orders
- The grant is rectified to substitute Stephen M’Ikunyua M’Imathiu in place of Susan Mukomunene Ikunyua.
- The grant is rectified to substitute Margaret Kaguri M’Ikiba in place of John Mwirigi Kiringo.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 261 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GILBERT KIRINGO RUKARIA (DECEASED)
FAITH KAGWIRIA KIRINGO.......................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
GEDIEL KIRIKI KIRINGO..........................................PETITIONER
MARY NKATHA .................................................................OBJECTOR
LUCY NKIROTE.................................................................OBJECTOR
R U L I N G
1. This is a ruling on three applications dated 17/9/2019, 19/9/2019 and 2/10/2019, respectively. On 17/9/2019, Stephen M’Ikunyua M’Imathiu filed a Summons for the rectification of the Certificate of confirmation of grant. He sought that he be substituted in the place of Susan Mukomunene Ikunyua.He stated that the said Susan Mukomunene Ikunyua was his wife and a beneficiary but had died on 16/12/2005.
2. Similarly, on 19/9/2019 Margaret Kaguri M’Ikiba took out a Summons seeking to be substituted in the place of John Mwirigi Kiringo. She contended that the said John Mwirigi was her husband but had died on 24/5/2016.
3. Finally, on 2/10/2019, Faith Kagwiria Kiringo took out a Summons seeking that the land registrar be ordered to dispense with the production of the original title deed for land parcel LR NO. NYAKI/KITHOKA/1909and that the Deputy Registrar be authorized to sign all the requisite documents in order to the effect the confirmed grant instead of the petitioner Gediel Kirimi Kiringo.
4. The latter application was based on the grounds on the face of it and on the supporting affidavit of Faith Kagwiria Kiringo.She contended that the petitioner had refused/declined to surrender the original title for LR NO. NYAKI/KITHOKA/1909 which had made the implementation of the said grant difficult.
5. On the issue of rectification, both Stephen M’Ikunyua M’Imathiu and Margaret Kaguri M’Ikiba are seeking to be substituted in the place of their spouses who are now deceased. They were beneficiaries of the estate and had portions distributed to them. The Court is alive that rectification of a grant under Section 74 of the Law of Succession and rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration rules is in respect of errors and mis-descriptions.
6. However, this does not affect the jurisdiction of this Court under section 47 of the Actfrom making such orders as are necessary to meet the ends of justice. In the present case, I am satisfied that the grant should be rectified as sought by the two applicants.
7. As regards the application by Faith Kagwara Kiringo,the same was not opposed. Her allegations that the administrator was delaying the effecting of the grant were not denied. Court orders are not made in vain. They are meant for a purpose which must be achieved. In this regard, I allow the application.
8. Accordingly, all the applications are allowed as prayed.
DATEDand DELIVEREDat Meru this 11th day of December, 2019.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE