[2016] KEHC 2463 (KLR)
The court held that the application for contempt was fatally defective because it was not brought under the correct legal framework, namely the Judicature Act, Cap 8, which governs contempt of court in civil proceedings. The Law of Succession Act and Probate and Administration Rules do not provide for contempt...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 2463 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: __MISSING__; Respondent: __MISSING__
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 795 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Contempt Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed and matter transferred
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Succession Proceedings, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
__MISSING__
Applicant
__MISSING__
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Contempt Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent should be punished for contempt of court in succession proceedings.
- 2 Whether the correct legal procedure for contempt proceedings was followed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the application for contempt was fatally defective because it was not brought under the correct legal framework, namely the Judicature Act, Cap 8, which governs contempt of court in civil proceedings. The Law of Succession Act and Probate and Administration Rules do not provide for contempt proceedings. Given the quasi-criminal nature of contempt proceedings and the need for strict compliance with due process, the court found no basis to cite the respondent for contempt. The application was therefore dismissed, and the applicant was advised to follow the correct procedure if they wished to pursue the matter further. Additionally, the court ordered the transfer of the...
Court Disposition
application dismissed and matter transferred
Orders
- The application dated 12th November 2011 is dismissed.
- The matter is transferred to the High Court of Kenya at Kiambu for final disposal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 795 OF 1997
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GITAU MUTUNGI (DECEASED)
RULING
1. The application for determination is the summons general dated 12th November 2011. The applicant seeks that the respondent be punished for contempt of court.
2. The application is founded on provisions of the Law of Succession Act, Cap 160, Laws of Kenya, and of the Probate and Administration Rules. None of these provisions provide a framework for trial of contemnors for contempt of court.
3. The law which governs contempt of court in civil proceedings is set out in the Judicature Act, Cap 8, Laws of Kenya.
4. There should always be a strict compliance with the law when it comes to punishing for contempt of court. The proceedings governing the same are quasi-criminal in nature, for the penalty provided for the offence is either imprisonment or payment of a fine. Due to the punitive nature of the proceedings it is imperative that the law be complied with to the letter.
5. As due process has not been adhered to in this case, I find no basis for citing the respondent for contempt of court. The applicant should endeavour to follow the correct procedure with respect thereto.
6. I shall accordingly dismiss the application dated 12th November 2011.
7. As the deceased was a resident of Kiambu County and the bulk of his estate is situated in that County, I shall direct that the matter be transferred to the High Court of Kenya at Kiambu for final disposal.
8. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE