[2021] KEHC 12665 (KLR)
The court found that the consent order of 13th June 2018, which resulted in the issuance of a fresh grant removing certain administrators, was obtained without disclosure of prior court orders that required the application for revocation of grant to be heard first. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 12665 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Kinuthia Ndegwa; Respondent: Danson Kirika Ndegwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1976 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Grant Revocation and Hearing Directions
- Outcome
- Orders of 13th June 2018 set aside; grant issued on that day revoked; grant of 19th October 2010 reinstated; pending applications adjourned; hearing date fixed for revocation application.
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Grant Revocation, Estate Distribution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kinuthia Ndegwa
Applicant
Danson Kirika Ndegwa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Grant Revocation and Hearing Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant issued on 13th June 2018 was validly obtained in light of prior court orders.
- 2 Whether the application dated 12th April 2011 for revocation of grant should be prioritized and heard before other applications.
- 3 Whether the status quo of the estate administration should be maintained pending determination of the revocation application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the consent order of 13th June 2018, which resulted in the issuance of a fresh grant removing certain administrators, was obtained without disclosure of prior court orders that required the application for revocation of grant to be heard first. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to review and set aside the orders of 13th June 2018 and revoked the grant issued on that day. The valid grant remains the one issued on 19th October 2010, with all four administrators. All pending applications, including the one dated 4th June 2020, are adjourned to allow for the prioritized hearing of the application dated 12th April 2011, as previously directed by the court. The...
Court Disposition
Orders of 13th June 2018 set aside; grant issued on that day revoked; grant of 19th October 2010 reinstated; pending applications adjourned; hearing date fixed for revocation application.
Orders
- The orders of 13th June 2018 are reviewed and set aside.
- The grant issued on 13th June 2018 is revoked.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1976 OF 1996
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GODFREY NDEGWA KARIUKI (DECEASED)
JOHN KINUTHIA NDEGWA..............................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
DANSON KIRIKA NDEGWA.........................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The deceased Godfrey Ndegwa Kariuki died intestate on 5th June 1995. On 16th September 1996 his sons Peter Kaniu alias Ndegwa Kariuki and Danson Kirika Ndegwa petitioned for the grant of letters of administration intestate. The grant was issued on 31st December 1996. The grant was confirmed on 30th June 1998, and the estate distributed. On 19th October 2010 a fresh grant was issued jointly to Peter Kaniu Ndegwa, John Kinuthia Ndegwa (the applicant), Danson Kirika Ndegwa (the respondent) and Jane Wanjiku Ndegwa. This followed an order on 19th October 2010 by the court in HCCC No. 76 of 1996 (OS).
2. There is an outstanding application dated 12th April 2011 by John Kinuthia Ndegwa and Jane Wanjiku Ndegwa against Peter Kaniu Ndegwa and Danson Kirika Ndegwa for the revocation of the grant issued on 19th October 2010 and the redistribution of the estate of the deceased. On 31st January 2014 Justice W.M. Musyoka observed that:-
“9. The journey to the resolution of the issues starts with the disposal of the revocation application. The determination of that application will decide the fate of the certificate of confirmation (of) grant dated 30th June 1998.
10. Pending the determination of the said application status quo ought to be maintained, otherwise the said application will be rendered nugatory.”
3. The Judge then ordered that the application dated 12th April 2011 be heard on priority basis.
4. Instead of the parties taking date for the hearing and disposal of that application, they have made several applications. On 13th June 2018 parties appeared before me, and without bringing to my attention what Justice W.M. Musyoka had directed, consented to the issuance of a fresh grant by removing Peter Kamau Ndegwa and John Kinuthia Ndegwa and leaving Jane Wanjiku Ndegwa and Danson Kirika Ndegwa. I find that this consent was obtained by non-disclosure to the court of the orders by Justice W.M. Musyoka. On my own motion, and bearing in mind the provisions of section 47 of the Law of Succession Actandrule 73 of the Probate Rules, I review and set aside the orders of 13th June 2018, and revoke the grant issued on that day. The grant shall remain the one issued on 19th October 2010, the administrators being Peter Kaniu Ndegwa, Danson Kirika Ndegwa, Jane Wanjiku Ndegwa and John Kinuthia Ndegwa.
5. Consequently, the application dated 4th June 2020 by John Kinuthia Ndegwa against Danson Kirika Ndegwa is hereby adjourned, as are all other pending applications, to allow for the hearing and determination of the application dated 12th April 2011, which the court had asked on 6th March 2017 that it be heard orally.
6. I direct that the application dated 12th April 2011 be heard on 10th May 2021.
DATED and DELIVERED NAIROBI this 15TH day of FEBRUARY 2021.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE