[2023] KEHC 23780 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 23780 (KLR)

The court found that there was no dispute as to the identity of the beneficiaries or the assets comprising the estate. The protestors' objections were limited to allegations of lack of consent and bad faith, but they failed to propose any alternative mode of distribution or contest the existence of the assets. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 23780 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Erick Kipyegon Sang; Applicant: Cherotich Viviline Ngeno; Respondent: Gilbert Kiprono Sang; Respondent: Richard Kipkemoi Sang; Respondent: Kenneth Kiprotich Sang; Respondent: Robert Kibet Sang; Respondent: Nancy Chepkemoi Maritim
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause E004 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Summons for confirmation of grant allowed; protest dismissed.
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Beneficiary Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Beneficiary Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erick Kipyegon Sang

Applicant

Cherotich Viviline Ngeno

Applicant

Gilbert Kiprono Sang

Respondent

Richard Kipkemoi Sang

Respondent

Kenneth Kiprotich Sang

Respondent

Robert Kibet Sang

Respondent

Nancy Chepkemoi Maritim

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the summons for confirmation of grant met the legal requirements for consent by all beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate was fair and lawful.
  3. 3 Whether the protestors' objections to the confirmation of grant had merit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no dispute as to the identity of the beneficiaries or the assets comprising the estate. The protestors' objections were limited to allegations of lack of consent and bad faith, but they failed to propose any alternative mode of distribution or contest the existence of the assets. The court determined that the petitioners' proposed distribution was fair and in accordance with the law, as all beneficiaries were included and the assets were to be divided equally, except for one asset specifically allocated. The protestors' failure to substantiate their claims or provide a viable alternative led the court to dismiss the protest and confirm the grant as proposed...

Court Disposition

Summons for confirmation of grant allowed; protest dismissed.

Orders

  • The estate of Grace Chepkirui Ngeno to be distributed as proposed in the affidavit supporting the summons for confirmation of grant dated September 22, 2022.
  • Kenya Commercial Bank Limited shares to be divided equally among the 12 beneficiaries.