[2020] KEHC 6267 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 6267 (KLR)

The court found that Catherine Wairimu Gatang’i, having obtained a Grant of Letters of Administration ad litem, is the rightful person to substitute the objector Joe Ephraim Kimani in the succession cause. The application for substitution was unopposed, and the court was satisfied that the legal requirements for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 6267 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Ephraim Kiongo Kimani; Applicant: Catherine Wairimu Gatang’i; Objector: Joe Ephraim Kimani
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 85 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Objector
Outcome
application for substitution allowed
Judges
LW Gitari
Legal Topics
Grant of Letters of Administration, Substitution of Parties, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Grant of Letters of Administration Substitution of Parties Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ephraim Kiongo Kimani

Petitioner

Catherine Wairimu Gatang’i

Applicant

Joe Ephraim Kimani

Objector

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Objector

  1. 1 Whether Catherine Wairimu Gatang’i should be allowed to substitute Joe Ephraim Kimani as objector in the succession cause.
  2. 2 Whether the application for substitution dated 19/12/2018 meets the legal requirements.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Catherine Wairimu Gatang’i, having obtained a Grant of Letters of Administration ad litem, is the rightful person to substitute the objector Joe Ephraim Kimani in the succession cause. The application for substitution was unopposed, and the court was satisfied that the legal requirements for substitution had been met. Accordingly, the application dated 19/12/2018 was allowed as prayed, enabling the proceedings to continue with the proper parties representing the interests of the estate and beneficiaries.

Court Disposition

application for substitution allowed

Orders

  • The application dated 19/12/2018 for substitution of the objector is allowed as prayed.